Yep, using AI for news is basically using the work of other human journalists. There's only a limited amount AI could do by itself (weather reports, short sports blurbs, stenographing police/IDF press conferences...), so they're just going to turn WaPo into more of an aggregator while other outlets produce the real news.
At that stage, why even pay for their product then?
Yep, using AI for news is basically using the work of other human journalists. There's only a limited amount AI could do by itself (weather reports, short sports blurbs, stenographing police/IDF press conferences...), so they're just going to turn WaPo into more of an aggregator while other outlets produce the real news.
At that stage, why even pay for their product then?