- cross-posted to:
- news
- usa@lemmy.ml
- cross-posted to:
- news
- usa@lemmy.ml
Bloomberg publishes an article by the famous historian Neil Ferguson “Any great power that spends more on interest payments on its debts than on defense will very soon cease to be great,” writes Ferguson. He notes that, unlike the first Cold War and the war on terror, the United States does not want to send its soldiers anywhere, limiting itself to the supply of weapons and money.
https://archive.ph/EEFup
Finding ways to slander the USSR, in an article that has nothing to do with the USSR. Oh Bloomberg!
The reasons are clear, the author and/or the publication just don't want to admit them. Ukrainian corruption. Russian forces adapting and finding ways to destroy/incapacitate NATO equipment that was thought to be technologically superior, and of course Russian forces utterly beating the crap out of the vaunted "Summer counter-offensive", which was designed, prepared and coordinated by NATO. The US and NATO cannot afford any more humiliation.
Obviously, there's also the Republicans holding hostage the most recent aid packages until they gained concessions in other policies, but that's just something that happened after the fact.
I have to disagree here. Ukraine might gain some advantage by wrecking Russian oil refineries. But they also attacked Russian radar systems whose sole purpose is to detect incoming nuclear strikes against Russia. The only one who benefits in this case, is someone with missile-mounted nuclear warheads, like the US. It is quite likely that those recent strikes had indeed been approved by Team Biden.
We know that the invasion was not going badly at all. We know that Russia always intended to settle the whole thing peacefully, that the SMO was just a way to force Ukraine to the negotiating table quickly, and that retreating was a gesture of good will.
Any chance of a negotiated peace is inexistent, so long as Zelensky has made it illegal for anyone to initiate peace talks with Russia. The Russians have stated multiple times that they are willing to talk at any time. They've made their terms known for a while now.
If this guy is a historian, I'll eat my hat. Events seem to be passing him by unnoticed. His only interpretation of what's going on is Western media and the propaganda they propagate.
Anything relating to the subjects of history, politics, or economics in western academia is basically just thinly veiled propaganda for the empire. The goal is, in each case, to indoctrinate people into a narrative that explains why western system is the best one possible, and then have them authoritatively regurgitate this narrative.