I'm not Gen Z, I just don't think that old is always historically significant. If anything, the bridge construction would be more important historicaly than the facades.
I don't think that's the case inherently. An 80 year-old structure (in 1959) that's designed to imitate an earlier architectural style? I wouldn't say that's terribly historically important, and like I said before, it makes zero sense for what the people planning the redevelopment of Hamburg wanted to do with the area (and yes, it looks shitty today). Disneyland's 67 years old, that doesn't give it value. And there's plenty of structures that are 80+ years old and are no longer usuable. At the same time, there's plenty of 80+ year old structures still in use to this day.
What's up with these incredibly brain dead gen z comments. Are you guys all post modern design dorks?
deleted by creator
I keep seeing gen z trash places that where built start of last century or before as gawdy etc.
It's called craftsman ship you dorks.
I'm not Gen Z, I just don't think that old is always historically significant. If anything, the bridge construction would be more important historicaly than the facades.
Old structures are historically important.
I don't think that's the case inherently. An 80 year-old structure (in 1959) that's designed to imitate an earlier architectural style? I wouldn't say that's terribly historically important, and like I said before, it makes zero sense for what the people planning the redevelopment of Hamburg wanted to do with the area (and yes, it looks shitty today). Disneyland's 67 years old, that doesn't give it value. And there's plenty of structures that are 80+ years old and are no longer usuable. At the same time, there's plenty of 80+ year old structures still in use to this day.
deleted by creator