Several legal experts expressed concern about the monitoring conditions imposed by the judge in Hannah’s husband’s case. But Phyllis Emerick, the chief deputy public defender in Monroe County, argues that because Hannah’s husband and his family consented to the surveillance, they gave up their rights to privacy. “He agreed that he would not access electronic devices in his household in exchange for release,” she says. “It was the family’s choice to continue living with him.”
"""Public defender"""
And ofc it was some NSA ghoul who developed & sold this panopticon bullshit
It was the family’s choice to continue living with him
and
Hannah’s husband and his family consented to the surveillance
Including 14yos.
I wonder how explicit that consent would have to be. Could I for example do a website for cheating on your spouse that targets senators and have them consent that everything in their houses gets send to me every other second?
"""Public defender"""
And ofc it was some NSA ghoul who developed & sold this panopticon bullshit
and
Including 14yos.
I wonder how explicit that consent would have to be. Could I for example do a website for cheating on your spouse that targets senators and have them consent that everything in their houses gets send to me every other second?