It Could Happen Here - The Chinese Economy Demystified: The State Owned Enterprise on Stitcher
www.stitcher.com
Mia discusses the emerging expert consensus on the Chinese economy and how the actual structure and function of Chinese State Owned Enterprises confounds and refutes it. You can now listen to all Cool Zone Media shows, 100% ad-free through the Cooler Zone Media subscription, available exclusively on Apple Podcasts. So, open your Apple Podcasts app, search for “Cooler Zone Media” and subscribe today! http://apple.co/coolerzone See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

  • China's economy is 40% state-owned – compare Lenin's NEP period, 70-77%

  • Soviet state-owned enterprises were designed to make a thing (like the water service, like the post office). Chinese state-owned enterprises are different: they are profit-making players in the market.

  • China has enterprises owned by local and provincial government – sometimes they compete with each other! So the state competes with itself on the market!

  • They can sell 49% of their stock on the stock market, even to foreigners.

  • The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission of the State Council (SASAC) is an institution directly under the management of the State Council. It is an ad-hoc ministerial-level organization directly subordinated to the State Council – http://en.sasac.gov.cn/sasacaboutus.html – It's like the Chinese statist Berkshire Hathaway. In theory, it can control a company as much as a shareholder can.

  • Li-Wen Lin & Curtis J Milhaupt write about Chinese corporate structure. They say when direct state industries (like post offices or Soviet bureaux) turned into profit-seeking state-owned things and essentially bought the party off, made it rich.

  • Iraglassceiling [she/her]
    ·
    1 year ago

    hyper sectarian shit stirrer

    I don’t doubt that you have a good reason to believe this, I just don’t see it - can you explain a little? There’s probably something I just don’t pick up on, but I do prefer the pop culture episodes (John Wayne, vince McMahon, etc) to the political ones so maybe I’m missing it.

    Or maybe it’s something to do with his social media presence? I don’t do Twitter/etc

    • KobaCumTribute [she/her]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Or maybe it’s something to do with his social media presence? I don’t do Twitter/etc

      Yeah, it's him picking fights and doing sectarian trolling on social media.

      • AbbysMuscles [she/her]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Fortunately I don't use the stupid fucking bird site, so I can enjoy a decent-quality podcast free of baggage

    • Maoo [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      He's called Robert Fedvans in left circles.

      He does the things you would do if you wanted to be, at minimum, a useful idiot for capital, starting with kneejerk anticommunism and being selectively lazy at researching the things behind your various accusations against others living or dead. And he is paid by Bellingcat, itself paid by a CIA cutout. It doesn't really matter if a self-labeled lefty doing toxic shit is secretly in favor of the US war and intelligence apparatus or not - the feds think the person is an asset and fund them through the same channels they use to destabilize "enemy" countries.