solid analysis by a comrade

    • silent_water [she/her]
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      except the blue party decides to help the red party enact transphobic laws. cf KOSA currently.

        • zifnab25 [he/him, any]
          ·
          1 year ago

          we should let reds win unopposed then

          We don't get to choose in any meaningful capacity. All we get to do is cheer for a team and spend a bunch of money on the merch.

          Voting isn't simply a pascal's wager. There's a real cost to political activism in time and money.

          What's more, when Leftists do organize politically (for instance, during the '16 and '20 Bernie campaigns), they come under attack from within the liberal party for failing to endorse the correct candidate.

          So you still get blamed for Hilary losing, even when you vote for her and she wins the popular vote and she wins your state and she enriches herself on your activism. Trans people still suffer and you're told that its all because you participated in the primaries.

        • silent_water [she/her]
          hexagon
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          yes, that's precisely the only two options. politics ends at voting.

          the democratic ratcheting effect guarantees further fascism, not harm reduction. we have to break the cycle, not persist in it, expecting different results.

          • Spaghettisprettygood [none/use name]
            ·
            1 year ago

            Nobody is arguing to only vote and nothing else. You are literally strawmanning an argument out of nowhere. Not voting dem doesn't make a communist revolution magically happen and is in fact going to make it harder.

            Republicans are significantly worse and with full power will be more likely to start going full fascist on minorities and vulnerable communities before Dems do.

            It is a tactical vote to buy time while we organize a revolution.

            • silent_water [she/her]
              hexagon
              ·
              1 year ago

              it doesn't buy time because of the ratcheting effect. the dems prevent a leftward swing. that's their function in society.

        • Mokey [none/use name]
          ·
          1 year ago

          The dems vs republicans is a pre-determined outcome, its an illusion of choice. Just because Biden won doesnt mean the trade war, bad covid policy or immigration detention camps ended, it many cases it got worse. It would of been the same outcome regardless of who won.

        • CannotSleep420
          ·
          1 year ago

          The reds aren't any further right on the fascism scale unironically.

        • FortifiedAttack [any]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          The Republicans exist for the purpose of keeping the Democrats perpetually in power. In exchange, the Democrats hardly do anything to oppose Republican interests.

          They are one and the same in the sense that they cooperate to play good cop/bad cop.

          It's a symbiotic relationship. They will never get rid of each other because they NEED each other to stay in power.

    • Sephitard9001 [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      How do you post this image this deep into Biden's presidency while he allows and encourages Trans oppression?

    • Sphere [he/him, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Call me when Biden loses because the economy drops into the shitter after the student loan payments resume and the pandemic relief is all dried up (you know, because of decisions he specifically made, not stuff the GOP did), and then tell me how exactly that counts as supporting trans people.

    • ThereRisesARedStar [she/her, they/them]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Biden is pushing an anti-trans law at the national stage and isn't helping trans people while states are actively genociding them. Stop using my people as a political cudgel for a party that hates them.

    • Rod_Blagojevic [none/use name]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Do you have any analysis of why transphobia/anti-semitism/every other form of racism and xenophobia is a valuable political tool? Are democrats doing anything that could plausibly make these reactionary forces less useful?

    • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Communists do not cause team blue to lose. There are not enough of us, especially living in the handful of counties that determine your national elections. Blaming the left for the defeats of dems isn't just lib nonsense its reactionary

      • Frank [he/him, he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        Yeah, that's the other thing. The dems obstinately refuse to do anything to materially help people.

    • FortifiedAttack [any]
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      This might shock you, but voting against the Red Party will, in fact, not cause the Red Party to disappear.

      Meaning that you'll need to vote blue every few years under the threat of your life ending, and then do that forever. You have no choice at all. Nice democracy, huh?

      This is just coercion. You may as well have a dictatorship ruled by the blue party, where you don't get to vote at all.

      In fact, it would be an objectively superior form of government to just have a one-party state ruled by the blue party. That way you won't have to worry about getting exterminated every 4 years. The results will otherwise be the same as if the Blue team won every election normally.

      Edit: In short, the entire American election process can be summed up as: "Vote blue, OR ELSE..."

    • Frank [he/him, he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      The blue party won, the red party is doing genocide anyway, the blue party is doing little if anything to even slow it down.

      I vote, i vote for dems, but afaik the dems aren't doing anything to slow down the gop. I don't think voting can make things worse, but it's also not particularly helpful.