69
Rant: "Vote Blue or you are privileged" is genocidal imo - Lemmygrad
lemmygrad.mlIm not going to pull punches on this rant. I am so exhausted by this rhetoric
and unfortunately it is pervasive in my personal life and online. I spend most
of my productive time reviewing literature on various global issues. Namely land
grab discourse, genocide studies, conservation efforts, state development
policy, IFI reports etc etc. Let me tell you something about the lives of rural
and Indigenous people in the global south. They get their homes burned down and
murdered in their sleep. Their lands are stolen from them with techniques
perfected by colonial powers, especially from US settler colonialism. The state
will steal their lands and “preserve it” for use of private capital, for white
settlers, or to create a national park or preserves that wealthy foriegners can
hunt game and so they can parade to the world how “modern” they are becoming. If
they cannot steal land outright they will use other more complicated manners to
incentivise rural people to be tied into market relations, such as dependence on
ecotourism or even biochar and other technologies presented as liberatory or as
needed due to damages colonialism has done. “A bit of colonialism will help your
colonialism problem,” if you will. These relations will contradict and then
corrode their lifeways and distracted from effective traditional methods because
white tourists don’t want to see the cattle of pastoralists when on vacation.
They are also shamed by the excess wealth of tourists, and the settlers that
facilitate tourism, encouraging them to become more enfranchised into modernity
so their lands will either become vulnerable to direct theft or the market
relations will mold them into what settlers want them to do for the benifit of
their estates. These extreme minority settlers often own like half of an entire
county, while the county next door is over half conservation area. This means
fewer lands for grazing and fewer water sources available for rural people. It
leads to starvation and death, especially during dry periods such as the current
drought in east Africa, all while the state concern trolls about food security
and executes the development dance to attract aid and FDI. It also means that
lands are degraded by over use because these people are being choked out of
their ancestral lands. The state and white settlers then blame the pastoralists
and forest dwellers and weaponize Human Rights against them, saying the rural
peoples are preventing the states quest for water security as they redirect all
waters to metro areas and settler estates. All of this is the genocidal process
of primative accumulation or accumulation by dispossession. It is a privilege I
am able to research these situations. It is a privilege that I am able to work
with organizations that work with local Tribes on the issues they are concerned
about. It is a privilege I am a grad student that is paid to do this, although
our union has to fight the university for a fraction of a living wage. I am not
privileged to not vote Blue. It is more like a curse of understanding. Who do
you think backs these violent efforts of dispossession? USAID is never far away.
The EU is never far away. The IFI are always right there. Conservation as we
know it was created in North America to conquer the continent and take the land
from Indigenous peoples and it has exported these methods abroad. All of this is
supported by institutions and policies that democrats and republicans alike
believe in and enable globally. It is supported by finance capital which is the
foundation of the present democratic party Let me tell you what people who vote
blue do about this. Kenya or some other post colonial state will massacre people
and burn down their homes and create a national park. Netflix will then hire
Obama to narrate a docuseriese on the glorious national parks of the world. Blue
voters will then consume the erasure and genocide of rural people as feel-good,
green™ content with satisfaction that the world is becoming a better place.
That’s it. Then they go vote blue. Anyone who says I am privileged to not vote
blue has no clue or no care regarding how the world works and is a combination
being hopelessly US centric, too focused on bourgeoisie partisanship and
embarrassingly naive about the world. Voting blue is the opposite of solidarity.
The people who say they are not privileged enough to not vote Blue fail to see
their own privilege of living in the Disney land of the global north. What ever
gains they think Democrats will give them will either never happen or will be
cut from the flesh of people they are happy to sacrifice. I will not be extorted
by bourgeoisie partisans. My moral worth and political identify is mine to
create, not theirs to demand. My concern is with the fundamental machinations of
capital and the devestating impact it has on people while it reproduces itself,
and it is most destructive in places far from the minds of democrats regardless
of issues in the US. I’m not going to be tricked into supporting a party that
enables the process of accumulation by dispossession, and that stands on a
foundation of genocide. They only have moral arguments but they do not have
moral standing.
solid analysis by a comrade
I would think that budding leftists by now would know that voting for Democrats is NOT a counter to the Republican party, but rather it legitimizes the existence of the Republican position and acts as a cudgel against the left. These are both rightwing parties that will resort to the same tactics despite different rhetoric. Biden himself said "We need a Republican party, and it has to be strong." Democrats have proven themselves as people who do not reverse damage, they just delay it. They act as seat warmers until their bosses return (the Republicans) and take their seats back.
For the record, I do vote, and I generally vote down ballot for Democrats, but I will under no condition vote for Democratic leadership I do not approve of. If the Democrats are going to pretend to be an opposition party, I am not going to let them be any more than that, and I will hold their feet to the fire promising them that they will never taste power if they don't make concessions to the left. I voted down ballot for democrats in 2020 but did not vote for Biden, I did a write in. If there is any way to nudge things electorally, that is how I tell the Democrats to "go fish". This strategy drives Liberals insane because it leaves them with no excuses and no options if they want more power. It also fires up opposition to the leadership in office that is just the normal political trend of the US. You can't keep teaching the American public that people like Biden is as good as it gets, and increasingly the Democrats are having a harder time trying to spin electoral losses as "being too far left" to their voting base.
Had Biden lost in 2020 we would be sitting with a combined congress against the president, constant public outcry against the administration, and leftist spaces flourishing with the idea that the people demand new direction with the strong presence of an opposition party with no clear leader (as the same old answer just failed). This is why Liberals were really going crazy about Trump in 2020. They were terrified of this result. Not because of Trump but because of how much he fired up leftist populism in response to his leadership and policies. Him festering in the White House for 4 more years could have continued to lead to democratic sweeps around the country. By 2024 with no clear heir for the Republican party, we could have bullied the Democrats into pushing a more progressive platform to reverse the years of damage. Instead we got what is probably the worst result of all. Which granted, was just bound to happen because there is only one direction this country can go. Down.
If you are going to pretend that "to protect Democracy you have to vote blue" then that just tells me democracy is dead anyway because you are saying there is no choice other than voting for the dueling bourgeoisie royal family that your might nebulously benefit from for a couple years. I won't vote as well if the person is truly a scumbag not fit for office. They call that "privilege". I call it standards.
If one wants to rely on shaming someone as being privileged (how liberal of them, and which by the way never works), then maybe we should start making excuses for the lack of terror if things are indeed that bad. But continuing the believe that electoral process or the institutions of America are a path forward is delusional. You can't get to the moon on a sabotaged rocket.
It is interesting how Liberals give themselves all kinds of rules that they operate under. One of them is: "The party is never wrong, it is always the voter."
Letting Republicans win isn't going to allow the revolution be easier to achieve. Republicans have been sliding right on the fascism scale at a frighteningly quick pace compared to democrats.
Remember the saying first they came for the communists? A communist revolution was not possible inside Nazi Germany, because fascism had more power and snuffed them out immediately. The same is going to happen to communists in the US with letting Republicans win, they are already paving the way by labeling democrats as communists.
This is a very dangerous game being played by letting Republicans win. It could let Dems become more progressive to try to win voters or it could shift them more to the right to get more voters, either way it guarantees the more fascist party more power.
Please read my post. I still And if you consider that dangerous then maybe they should try to win my vote for once.
I mean that kind of assumes that they want to win or care if they do
The voters want to win, if the party doesn't they will find someone who does. But that requires people having standards and not just blindly voting bloo no matter who.
Im not really convinced by this, nothing would make liberals more happy than being fraudulently oppressed losers
Oh believe me, I am not standing here saying you have to vote. Not in the slightest.
I vote in a manner that I feel is the most synergistic between what everyone wants to call "harm reduction" without betraying my values. American politics is so binary that I feel that trying to use it to stem the tide of right-wing extremism while trying to find ways to weaken the Democrats from within is the ideal approach. My view is keep them a headless opposition party that maintains as much legislative power as possible to counter any right-wing leadership. Let the Republicans be the face of everything that is wrong, and leave the Democrats unable to follow in their footsteps, but work against them.
There is little to nothing you are going to accomplish electorally, but that little bit I still try to use and leverage. You can say it won't matter, but it won't stop me from trying. I am not advocating that others do the same or vote one way or another. My original post was a explanation of my position while issuing a takedown on the useless Liberals that have no plan or direction other than to be "not the other party".
Saying im not going to vote is the most harmful thing I can do to a liberal, even if I do vote i tell them I dont
Very well. Keep up the good fight comrade.
Edit: I do also tell people I didn't vote for Biden and that is enough. My stepmother had an utter meltdown when I told her wasn't going to... which ultimately I didn't.
on a national level. You can easily egg the house of your city alderman if you don't like what he's doing and if you're lucky enough to have local comrades maybe you can do more than just keeping out as many christofascists as possible.
Youre not going to have a pleasant time around here if you lib out and also don't read the posts you're replying to.
To point out a flaw in your post unrelated to not reading what the person you're replying to posted, the communists in Germany where crushed on the order of social democrats who were in many ways left of the democratic party. That is why we joke that Bernie killed Rosa. Historically both democrats and Republicans have implemented anti-communist measures.
I would highly encourage you to read a marxist perspective on the lead up to Nazi Germany. I would also recommend "the economy and class structure of german fascism" while you're at it to understand the role of liberals in enabling fascism.