Char [she/her]@mander.xyz to

guns • 1 year ago

Not a bad look for a future red army.

cross-posted to:
firearms@lemmygrad.ml

5

Not a bad look for a future red army.

Char [she/her]@mander.xyz to

guns • 1 year ago

cross-posted to:
firearms@lemmygrad.ml

You must log in or register to comment.

Chat

RangeFourHarry [they/them]
·
1 year ago
I mean just cause they’re called the red army doesn’t mean they have to be red

link

guns

You are not logged in. However you can subscribe from another Fediverse account, for example Lemmy or Mastodon. To do this, paste the following into the search field of your instance: !guns@hexbear.net

“Under no pretext"

Rules (Under review):

1. NO BUYING, SELLING OR TRADING of guns or accessories. Take that to Reddit and /r/GunAccessoriesForSale or Armslist.com
1. Censor all personally identifiable information in posts including serial numbers on firearms.
1. Any post or comment advocating illegal action will be removed and the poster warned. A second infraction will result in a ban.
1. Unironically suggesting the SKS as a usable rifle in the 21st Century when there are things like the AK and AR that cost only a bit more might result in a ban, it depends on how we feel.
1. Discussion of hunting is acceptable but please put "CW: hunting" in post titles. Debating the ethicality of hunting is also fine, but keep it civil and don't derail other people's threads.

Visibility: Public

This community can be federated to other instances and be posted/commented in by their users.

18 users / day
373 users / week
442 users / month
946 users / 6 months
2.29K local subscribers
2.44K subscribers
4.72K Posts
7.88K Comments
Modlog