• DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      Damn, depicting yourself as the chad and your opponents as the soyjack is so much older than the internet.

      There's probably like, some ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs where Ramses depicts himself as the chad Pharaoh and like...the Nubians or whoever as virgins and soyjacks.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Nearly every single one in fact, one of the staple techniques was to depict important people as bigger, nonimportant as smaller and enemies a wretched and cowering. For example, famous stela of Narmer, the very first pharaoh living over 5000 years ago:

        Show

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No idea about american libertarians (though considering the meaning of the word "liberal" in USA ther they will probably protest) but if you call polish libertarian "liberal" they will either get mad for comparing them to those "socialists" from PO or you will hear a long word salad about true libertarianism etc.

        • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah, but explaining it is easy — just say you meant classical liberalism which is what libertarianism literally is

          • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            Polish libertarianism overlaps with monarchism and nazism much and for most of them libertarianism is just "something i like" while "everything i don't like" is socialism.

    • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think they were intending to mean if the US was somehow actually attacked like the War of 1812 again, but maybe that’s giving too much credit

  • ElHexo
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • Tee@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        I saw that, was fucking unhinged 💀💀I meant the same party from different states being in beef w each other through comments

  • su25@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    "peace and diplomacy" AND "national defense"? they do know that maintaining and "defending" american hegemony requires constant violence right?

    • Shinhoshi@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      1 year ago

      I wonder if they’re trying to be “isolationist” as if that was a real foreign policy the US had