If they go by logic that Xi is satan and USA is god, that means that Xi killed about 11 people while USA killed billions.
Say no to sino
Sino literally means Chinese people, the ethnicity. It doesn't mean the PRC. It's almost like "we hate the government not the people" is a complete lie!
theres a reason its “fire and brimstone.” the sunshine and rainbows only come after god drowns 99.99% of humanity. these ppl worship amerikan genocide and then falsely accuse the CPC of atrocities bc they cant stand to admit there is a better way that will lift all people out of poverty and homelessness, and ensure their material needs are met
didnt mean any anti christian sentiment btw, just against the reactionary, evangelical bastardization of christianity
USA: spreads death destruction everywhere, grinds nations into poverty, never keeps a single one of its promises.
China: constructive, creative, lifts millions out of poverty, advances the cause of humanity and keeps the Great Satan in check.
Yeah, China is totally the demonic one here.
Wasn't there some figure that was published that China has fewer people in poverty than the US despite having 4x the population and 10x the average density?
Also the unanswered question remains: is Satan a dutiful servant of God, testing people for God's sadistic pleasure, or did he really rebelled and the big G is not so omnipotent and omniscient as advertised (also what about the free will of angels)?
I find alternate readings of religious texts interesting though I haven't looked into it much because my foundation is so weak I cannot discern fact from fiction. There is a book by Periyar about an alternate reading of Ramayana (a Hindu epic). Periyar was a South Indian activist advocating for the rights and identity of South Indians. He says that the villain in Ramayana was not really bad etc. I don't know Ramayana enough to judge the work but it's very interesting. My religious relatives got really mad when I talked to them about it.
Well people used to call alternate readings "heresy", "blasphemy" and so on (some still are). Problem with religious texts is that they are usually written more or less purposefully vague so interpretations can vary wildly and you can prove basically whatever you want since it's all based on faith anyway, you cannot observably prove anything.
Yeah this tend to happen when you overthink the supernatural.
