• TheLepidopterists [he/him]
    ·
    1 year ago

    If I said that I supported people's rights to sell marijuana and I didn't even think they should get much jail time for it, people would rightly point out that I was lying about my support.

    You stated that you supported self determination for people in the Donbas, and I didn't ignore it at all, I'm saying that even within the same post you proved that you actually didn't when you referred to their allies entering their territory as an invasion.

    Again, I'm not ignoring anything, I just think you're a liar and that you only started pretending to support the Donbas's self determination because doing otherwise would undermine the point you were trying to make about Taiwan.

      • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
        ·
        1 year ago

        You're literally mad at me for NOT reading between the lines and assuming you meant something other than what you said, asshole.

          • SuperNovaCouchGuy2 [any]
            ·
            1 year ago

            But you gotta acknowledge that calling Russia's intervention an "invasion" is antithetical to supporting Donbas.

          • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
            ·
            edit-2
            1 year ago

            You keep saying that you support it and then adding caveats that prove that you actually don't.

            "I support Tom's claim that he owns this house and would only want brief jail time for Susan's breaking and entering through the unlocked front door when he invited her over to help protect him from his neighbors Steve, who keeps shooting at him. That said, Susan went way too far when she also did a breaking and entering into Steve's yard to attack him while he continued to shoot at Tom while shouting 'That house is rightful Steve property and Tom the cockroach can scurry back to Susan's house.'"

            If someone said this, the only logical conclusion is that they actually fully support Steve and are lying about supporting Tom.