If you see the feds pulling out a second former YPG guy who mysteriously gets a ton of popularity over the Epstein case (TA with the launch of their pod and Helali finding the second black book with the patch notes removing mossad "off ebay" and then getting blasted into minor relevance by the daily beast) and you don't question what's going on here, is there any hope for you?
Worth mentioning Evans though, I remember when he was just a Funny Cold War Facts writer on Cracked which was introduced to me by a more bazingafied classmate.
Of course. Don't you love our established Twitter comedians who remind us that no matter how much we joke around, at the end of the day Iran is freaking cringe and their president dying in a firey crash is like Looney Tunes (it's only tragic when it happens to basketball players).
Yeah, let's make fun of the only few leaders standing up to the genocidal regime and mourn a rich man who was too good to just drive from orange county to Los Angeles (something thousands of people do everyday). Oh they are religious, ok what has your agnosticism and liberalism done to stop the genocide?
Yeah it was launched right before Epstein "killed himself" and since then they've made every effort to summarize the story incompletely, alienate victims (retraumatizing Virginia Giuffre and then trying to act like it doesn't matter because she is visibly cooked on Twitter), and pivot away to the most boring unrelated shit about the World Economic Forum, how the pandemic is making people depressed, generic finance news not even related to Jamie Dimon's trial. They never talk about that shit. Go look at Wall Street on Parade and you will realize Liz Warren stans are more proactive.
Also I'm sure this isn't actually relevant to you since you don't care about the details of the Epstein case or anything I'm saying, but "Jamie Dimon's trial" was a bowlderization on my part. He is coming up in JPMorgan trials. But then again nobody else has ever mentioned this to you and likely you will forget the entire case soon enough. Just another crazy thing that happened around when everything went to hell
Why are you reading this? Is it an attack? You'll never know because you don't value this information 👍
edit: Thank you so much for piquing my interest in this again, TrueAnon and showrunners' Twitter accounts have mentioned Dimon once since the show started, and not in this context.
back in 2017 though, Dimon was of potential interest to Franczak as he could be part of the bad globalists and trying to institute basic income 😂guess that interest has passed
they mentioned JPmorgan twice to remark a trial settlement exists but did not go into detail like they did with Maxwell's trial which they did extreme nonstop fixation on, although of course the bank does come up in other contexts because this is now A Money Show. fantastic work. I must be built different because my fantastic work looks pretty different. Was wondering if I wasn't tuning in for rare non-boring non-nothingburger shows but there is mounting evidence I'm right, like I always am
I guess their time is just more valuable than mine, and Virginia Giuffre's. Jamie Dimon's time is so valuable you didn't even think about him until Trump picked him. Nobody even bothered to make a fuss about it.
Well you bring trivia about the show off the top of your head and you're replying to someone talking about it to nitpick. "You don't have to listen to the show" is a standard defense for people who do. Unfortunately your earlier reply is less funny now.
You should have started pretending to listen to it so I could keep explaining the lore.
Yep, that's why I question these things. I stopped listening when he had on a guest justifying the Syrian intervention and I was like, I am done with this shit. You don't get to have a say in Syrian affairs as some sort of drug rehab.
Evans is an admitted fed and justifies every intervention in the mid east and beyond. I instantly avoided Evans podcast as I sensed something was off. He would go all ham on people like Stalin and then make excuses for people like Reagan. Even not being knowledgeable I knew the fucker had an agenda and it wasn't good.
If you see the feds pulling out a second former YPG guy who mysteriously gets a ton of popularity over the Epstein case (TA with the launch of their pod and Helali finding the second black book with the patch notes removing mossad "off ebay" and then getting blasted into minor relevance by the daily beast) and you don't question what's going on here, is there any hope for you?
Worth mentioning Evans though, I remember when he was just a Funny Cold War Facts writer on Cracked which was introduced to me by a more bazingafied classmate.
TA got traction because Brace was already friends with the other leftist brooklyn podcasters, no?
Of course. Don't you love our established Twitter comedians who remind us that no matter how much we joke around, at the end of the day Iran is freaking cringe and their president dying in a firey crash is like Looney Tunes (it's only tragic when it happens to basketball players).
Yeah, let's make fun of the only few leaders standing up to the genocidal regime and mourn a rich man who was too good to just drive from orange county to Los Angeles (something thousands of people do everyday). Oh they are religious, ok what has your agnosticism and liberalism done to stop the genocide?
Did you forget when they launched him or something? Does anyone else remember dates and events here?
They appeared on Chapo right as they begun their podcast.
Yeah it was launched right before Epstein "killed himself" and since then they've made every effort to summarize the story incompletely, alienate victims (retraumatizing Virginia Giuffre and then trying to act like it doesn't matter because she is visibly cooked on Twitter), and pivot away to the most boring unrelated shit about the World Economic Forum, how the pandemic is making people depressed, generic finance news not even related to Jamie Dimon's trial. They never talk about that shit. Go look at Wall Street on Parade and you will realize Liz Warren stans are more proactive.
You don't have to listen to it
This is the funniest possible reply, thank you.
I don't know why you're going after me lol
Also I'm sure this isn't actually relevant to you since you don't care about the details of the Epstein case or anything I'm saying, but "Jamie Dimon's trial" was a bowlderization on my part. He is coming up in JPMorgan trials. But then again nobody else has ever mentioned this to you and likely you will forget the entire case soon enough. Just another crazy thing that happened around when everything went to hell
Why are you reading this? Is it an attack? You'll never know because you don't value this information 👍
edit: Thank you so much for piquing my interest in this again, TrueAnon and showrunners' Twitter accounts have mentioned Dimon once since the show started, and not in this context.
back in 2017 though, Dimon was of potential interest to Franczak as he could be part of the bad globalists and trying to institute basic income 😂guess that interest has passed
they mentioned JPmorgan twice to remark a trial settlement exists but did not go into detail like they did with Maxwell's trial which they did extreme nonstop fixation on, although of course the bank does come up in other contexts because this is now A Money Show. fantastic work. I must be built different because my fantastic work looks pretty different. Was wondering if I wasn't tuning in for rare non-boring non-nothingburger shows but there is mounting evidence I'm right, like I always am
I guess their time is just more valuable than mine, and Virginia Giuffre's. Jamie Dimon's time is so valuable you didn't even think about him until Trump picked him. Nobody even bothered to make a fuss about it.
Looks like their work is done with you lot! Wow!
I wasn't sure why you think this is personal but I suppose I did defame your personal friends 🥺
I don't listen to TrueAnon
Well you bring trivia about the show off the top of your head and you're replying to someone talking about it to nitpick. "You don't have to listen to the show" is a standard defense for people who do. Unfortunately your earlier reply is less funny now.
You should have started pretending to listen to it so I could keep explaining the lore.
Yep, that's why I question these things. I stopped listening when he had on a guest justifying the Syrian intervention and I was like, I am done with this shit. You don't get to have a say in Syrian affairs as some sort of drug rehab.
Evans is an admitted fed and justifies every intervention in the mid east and beyond. I instantly avoided Evans podcast as I sensed something was off. He would go all ham on people like Stalin and then make excuses for people like Reagan. Even not being knowledgeable I knew the fucker had an agenda and it wasn't good.