A small trial from the Cleveland Clinic is the first head-to-head analysis of how erythritol affects cardiovascular risks compared with sugar.
Archived version: https://archive.ph/5yESq
n=20. This is wayyyy too small a study to draw conclusions beyond "more research required".
If you were actually versed in statistics and designing scientific studies, you would know that is a perfectly acceptable sample size.
I avoid erythritol because you have to use so much of it. With something like aspartame it's so much sweeter than sugar per gram that even if it all converted to formaldehyde a few sodas would be nothing to worry about. But erythritol is 30% less sweet than sugar so they put a bunch in. And the full effects of a bunch of a not-very-metabolized substance haven't been well-enough studied for me to not just get some other fake sugar thing instead.
As the other commenter said, though, this study had very small N.
Something has to be wrong with artificial sweeteners based on how they taste
The statement is partially true. Some artificial sweeteners, such as sucralose and aspartame, have been shown in certain studies to affect insulin response. However, the effect can vary depending on the sweetener, the individual, and the context (e.g., whether consumed with other foods). The evidence is mixed, and not all artificial sweeteners have been proven to significantly impact insulin levels.
Overall, while there may be some effects on insulin response, it's not a uniform response across all artificial sweeteners or individuals.
Your information was misleading and incomplete. Don’t be upset if an LLM can supply the missing pieces.