🚨 NEW: The IFS has backed Rachel Reeves's claim that Labour inherited a worse financial situation than expected, criticising the Home Office for 'woeful' budget figures under the Tories that underestimated asylum costs

The budget for 3 years was £320m, but spending hit £7.9bn

  • mannycalavera@feddit.uk
    ·
    4 months ago

    criticising the Home Office for 'woeful' budget figures under the Tories that underestimated asylum costs

    I've said it once I'll say it again. The HomeOffice is utterly incompetent. Don't expect this to change under Labour. It's an institutional problem that needs root and branch reform.

  • FuckyWucky [none/use name]
    ·
    4 months ago

    IFS or IMF? Because the rhetoric is the same. They claimed a few years ago that UK will be "paying for" COVID for decades, no not because of long COVID but because increased spending during the period prevented complete collapse.