So, in order to avoid typing "flatpak run", every time I need to run a flatpak program from the terminal, to have gui programs installed using nix appear in my applications menu(rofi, in this case), and to avoid typing the entire path to my .local/bin, I had added the following lines to my .profile:

set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists

if [ -d "$HOME/bin" ] ; then export PATH="$HOME/bin:$PATH" fi

set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists

if [ -d "$HOME/.local/bin" ] ; then export PATH="$HOME/.local/bin:$PATH" fi

for desktop entries for packages installed using Nix

export XDG_DATA_DIRS="/home/guest/.nix-profile/share:$XDG_DATA_DIRS"

set PATH so it includes user's private bin if it exists

if [ -d "/var/lib/flatpak/exports/bin" ] ; then export PATH="/var/lib/flatpak/exports/bin:$PATH" fi

if [ -d "~/.local/share/flatpak/exports/bin" ] ; then export PATH="~/.local/share/flatpak/exports/bin:$PATH" fi

However, for some weird reason, I cannot take advantage of the above lines unless I am in a tmux session or I explicitly type the following command:

source .profile

Any ideas on how to fix this?

EDIT: Adding the following line to .xsessionrc fixed the issue (haven't checked for wayland sessions though).

. $HOME/.profile

#Debian #Debian11 #foss #floss #libre_software #applications #desktop #gui #nix #flatpak #flatpaks #gnu #linux #opensource #open_source #tmux #bash #profile #shell #terminal

  • alembiq@lemmy.sdf.org
    ·
    1 年前

    I had a similar issue some time ago, not sure which distro it was. The solution was to rename the .profile to .bash_profile :)

      • bahmanm@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 年前

        You've probably already checked it out but make sure you've got only one of .profile, .bash_profile, .bashprofile. bash will only execute one of them in case there's more than one (not sure which one off the top of my head.)

        • Libre Extremist@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          1 年前

          I only have .profile. Actually adding those lines as to .bashrc as suggested by @palordrolap@kbin.social helped for the flatpak commands. But the issue with .desktop files for programs installed using nix still persists.

      • Ann Onymous@lemmy.blahaj.zone
        ·
        1 年前

        Does your .bashrc actually source .bash_profile? Add [ ! -f "~/.bash_profile" ] || . "~/.bash_profile" (.bash_profile doesn't exist or source it) to the end if not.

        • aebletrae [she/her]
          ·
          1 年前

          Since .bashrc is executed for all non-login shells, it shouldn't really source .profile, which is only meant for login shells, and might trigger expensive activity. (.profile might source .bashrc, but that`s fine.)

  • aebletrae [she/her]
    ·
    1 年前

    Are other lines in .profile being executed, or is the whole file ignored? Have you logged out and in again since adding these lines?

      • aebletrae [she/her]
        ·
        1 年前

        But those kinds of initialisations belong in .profile (or, if you're using a weird desktop environment, its own configuration file), particularly if you want .desktop files to work. (In .bashrc, PATH will grow longer in each subshell, which shouldn't cause problems but is wasteful.)

        So, what desktop environment (GNOME, KDE, Cinnamon, etc.) are you using?

        .profile is executed by login shells for the benefit of it and its subshells, and by DEs like Cinnamon for the benefit of .desktop launchers at login.

        So, have you logged out and back in again since adding these lines to .profile?

        And of course, the .profile has to be executed properly for its configuration to take effect, so it`s useful to know if the problem is with those specific lines, or the file as a whole.

        Add:—

        date >> ~/profile-execution-log-top.txt
        echo $PATH >> ~/profile-execution-log-top.txt
        

        to the top of .profile, and:—

        date >> ~/profile-execution-log-end.txt
        echo $PATH >> ~/profile-execution-log-end.txt
        

        to the bottom of .profile (use alternative paths as you see fit) to monitor that activity. You can test this by sourcing .profile but the real test is logging out and in again. Look at the time when you do this so you can correlate each action with each timestamp in the log files. If .profile is executed to completion, you should have two files with matching timestamps but different PATHs. If you don't have a matching timestamp in the "end" log file, there's a problem mid-execution. If neither file is being updated, .profile isn't being executed at all.

        • Libre Extremist@lemmy.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          1 年前

          Hi, Thanks for the response. Sorry for disturbing you. I have tried what you have suggested here. There are two files with matching timestamps but different PATHs. I am using i3wm in Debian 11. Please tell me how to deal with this issue.

          • aebletrae [she/her]
            ·
            1 年前

            Admittedly, I have much less experience with i3, so I fired up a virtual machine with Debian 11.6 and installed i3 (along with lightdm) and was able to recreate the problem of .profile not being executed when logging in, so this isn't unique to your particular setup. Great!

            Fortunately, this combination does execute commands in ~/.xsessionrc, so I added:—

            . $HOME/.profile
            

            to that file, then logged out and back in again. That did the trick for me, with the commands in .profile then successfully modifying the PATH variable (and writing additional lines to the execution log files), so I suggest you try creating/modifying .xsessionrc in the same way.

            • Libre Extremist@lemmy.ml
              hexagon
              ·
              1 年前

              Oh, thanks a lot for the efforts! You really are one of a kind to conduct an experiment to help out a stranger on the internet. Yeah, this actually works. I just added those lines to .xsessionrc and all problems were solved.

              If you don't mind my asking. Do you work in IT as a sysadmin or a developer or a cybersecurity expert? Or something else? I am just curious as to how may have gained such knowledge.

              • aebletrae [she/her]
                ·
                1 年前

                Helping one another out is invisibilized, not rare. A good chunk of what I know comes from other people taking the time to explain why something works the way it does and how you can see that for yourself. The rest is from curiosity, experimentation, and hammering away at something until it fits. It's not professionally specialized knowledge.