• UlyssesT
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    deleted by creator

      • cfgaussian@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        5 months ago

        Pop science journalism is also frequently sensationalist garbage. In my own field where i am familiar with the subject matter i'd say they have a hit rate of maybe 50% where they actually write something good albeit boring for the average reader, and that's mostly because the people writing have a real background in science. In other fields where the journalists are essentially amateur enthusiasts the ratio of decent pieces to garbage is even worse.