Fairly recognizable arguments, but in case people have not seen them before 
To typical techbros, they only want more of what they already like and copy of a copy bleakness is a feature because they don't want to feel uncomfortable by seeing something too new, "political" or otherwise. The treat printers are working as intended for them.
That's why just about every front page general population presentation from the treat printers is something like DilutedCyberpunkWaifu #51353421.
Oh lord don't have this start the nonsense "AI" "Art" struggle session again please
i disagree with the premise: i'm pretty sure we have dozens of art shitposts and cia nonsense made by people where they remove the influence of such choices to make some point that's entirely lost on me because the "art" doesn't represent, convey, or look like anything.
a generative model is trivially not an artist, but there's no reason actual (as opposed to marketing scam) artificial intelligence, if that ever exists, couldn't produce art.
or you could read the article and find that it agrees with you
(at least on second point). On the first point, if you mean modern art, eh its still represents some arcane choices for author or some point they try to make
