• SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      1 year ago

      we should call utopian socialists dystopian socialists. a type of 'revolution', if successful, that would probably be a more effective genocide machine than nuclear apocalypse lol.

      right-wing day of rage type shit, night of the rope turner diaries type shit, Jakarta method, Pinochet type shit. fuckin idealism Evola would respect. an anarchist that would side with empire over tankies and threatens to murder communists is a fascist. anarcho-fascist, whatever. deserve much the same respect (face => pavement).

      • Neptium@lemmygrad.ml
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        Yeah I never really respected anarchists even when I was a baby leftist. Not only do they give off too much LARP vibes, the movement is also non existent in Malaysia. And I really only found about their existence on Twitter (of course I did).

        Like they were spewing some shit about China’s authoritarianism during the Hong Kong protests. … like sure? Very relevant to the conditions that the proletariat faces in Southeast Asia I think. Definitely in contention to what is already the abysmal state of left politics here.

        Also this authoritarianism ”critique” just falls in line with what the ultra-reactionary right says with the whole “China is Communist and is genociding muslims!!!” thing.

        I can’t even imagine the material conditions that would sustain an Anarchist revolution in SEA let alone here. Unless they setup a settler colony on an island I guess lol.