More context:

https://innocenceproject.org/cases/marcellus-williams/

  • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    Reading about it I am not completly convinced that he is innocent

    After the reams and reams of verifiable miscarriages of justice against Black people, after 160 years of carceral slavery being the law of the land, after 50+ years of the school-to-prison pipeline disproportionately affecting Black people, you still trust the settler's 'court of law'?????????

    That'd be laughable if it wasn't so damn typical.

    • FunkyStuff [he/him]
      ·
      2 months ago

      I think there's an interesting phenomenon where even white normies understand how demonically racist the American institutions are. Ideologically committed racists don't, but everyone else sees at least part of it. However, because this only gives you a negative assertion (don't trust what the courts say) and the isn't really a normative, absolute system we can trust in the absence of any reliable rulings from the hegemonic institutions, we're just left with a wide space of viable interpretations of reality, which lets people get off the hook for assuming reality must be close-ish to what said racist institutions uphold. That closeness between imagined reality and the reality white supremacy wishes to impose is what allows for people who aren't ideologically committed racists to passively accept the brutalization and murder of marginalized people. "Oh, I can't support those cruel acts, but the sad reality is they probably didn't happen for no reason either" is the refrain of the embarrassed white moderate.

      • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
        ·
        2 months ago

        “Oh, I can’t support those cruel acts, but the sad reality is they probably didn’t happen for no reason either” is the refrain of the embarrassed white moderate.

        I'm ashamed to admit that specifically with regard to police brutality, I was in the "they must have had a reason" camp (without looking any further into it) for many more years than I had any excuse to be. Rodney King put a crack in that, but I was still pretty young then, and surrounded by my own privilege. It was many years later before I realized that sort of shit and worse was happening constantly.

        • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
          ·
          2 months ago

          I was in the "they must have had a reason" camp (without looking any further into it) for many more years than I had any excuse to be.

          At least you understand why it's fucked up that you were, unlike a couple other settlers and their waterbearing emigré lapdogs in this thread.

          • octopus_ink@lemmy.ml
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Thanks, but the unfortunate problem I see among many of my white peers is that's a deep valley. You don't get to the other side of "they must have had a reason" without exposing yourself to multiple instances where they clearly had no such reason.

            And it's not exactly something you can force on people. A couple people I know have started paying a bit more attention when cop videos float across their tiktok feed based on comments I've made, and they are coming around too, but folks need to want to see to the other side of that valley, and it's a very comfortable valley to live in - and more importantly you've always got a fresh batch of people moving into the valley.

      • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
        ·
        2 months ago

        "Not completely convinced of his innocence" even in the face of DNA evidence invalidates everything else they said. Like, you do not get to couch white moderate "oooooh, I don't know" bullshit when the DNA already exonerated mans. Fuck outta here.

        • jsomae@lemmy.ml
          ·
          2 months ago

          Bro said "I think that there is 100% plausible reason to doubt that he is guilty," you don't get to just pretend like they wrote "I still think he did it." Maybe practice listening to people. Typical toxic masculinity.

          • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            Nope. They opened with white moderate bullshit. I don't give the first fuck what they have to say after that; I do not humor white moderates, non-whites who bear their mentalities, or those who disregard the evidence that 100% exonerates a Black man to still fix their face to "mmmmmmh..."; especially not when it's in defense of murderous carceral slave-masters.

            Typical Karen-assed settler tryna talk over actual abolitionists.

          • heggs_bayer [none/use name]
            ·
            2 months ago

            Reading about it I am not completly convinced that he is innocent

            This implies there is a non-zero chance he was guilty. In reality, there is a zero percent chance he was guilty. Even implying there is a small chance he was guilty is white supremacy.

            Typical toxic masculinity.

            Typical liberal grasping at straws when your bigoted worldview is challenged.

            • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
              ·
              2 months ago

              English doesn't have a word for how much I despise condescending, know-nothing dogs like them. Whether settler or minstrel, there is not a word, slur, or malediction in this language to properly encompass the contempt I feel for them.

            • jsomae@lemmy.ml
              ·
              edit-2
              2 months ago

              Reading about it

              Looks like they did more than you. There is indeed quite a bit of evidence that suggests he was guilty, which you'd realize if you weren't just discounting all of it as surely sprouting from white supremacy. But our justice system works on the presumption of innocence, or at least it's meant to. That it failed to, that our justice system is structurally flawed, that's what's racist -- not the real possibility he might have been guilty. Lol, literally nothing in this world has a zero percent chance, and if you think it does, you're honestly blinded by your fucked up pseudo-ideology.

              Learn what structural racism means, and until then don't call yourself a leftist.

              Anyway I g2g have a life. Peace out.

          • Kuori [she/her]
            ·
            edit-2
            2 months ago

            hey dickhead, their pronouns are right in their username. don't accuse non-men of "toxic masculinity"

      • frauddogg [they/them, null/void]
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        No. You opened with white moderate, frankly blatantly-supremacist bullshit in service of the "legal" system, you can fuck right off, peckerwood. It's super-cute how you settlers keep ignoring my 'no' to try and make me accept supremacist thought, btw. Even more shameful that you're apparently not even white and doing that; do you realize whose shoes you lick?

        Every single possible person from the screw on his prison row all the way up to the FAMILY OF THE VICTIMS were out here saying "well I don't think he did it", the DNA said he didn't do it, and waterbearers like you will still sit there, fixing your face the whole time to play the "well, he was no angel" card why on Allah's green creation would any self-respecting Black person continue listening to your fuckery after an opener like "wellllllll I am not completly convinced that he is innocent, buuuuuuuuuuut..."???

        You. Cape. For. Dead. Black folk. Get the fuck out of my inbox. Get the fuck out of it twice for not even fuckin being from here and thinking you have a right to opine on innocent dead Black men, or run defense for the crackers who murdered them. Piece of shit.

        • KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          that comment is the opinion of like, the average person? Why is it problematic, did they edit out a huge chunk between this post and now or something?