I've noticed many people promote VPNs for torrenting to evade legal troubles in some places. But I wonder how do VPN companies get away with legal complaints? Especially if their servers are located in Germany or Japan, where piracy is heavily penalized.

p.s. I have never used a VPN for piracy, and I have never received any DMCA emails.

  • bastionntb@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    Its simple really. If you have an IP address on a torrent network, contact its owner. The owner of the IP will then be forced to contact the user... But if the owner doesn't keep logs... Then they don't know who the user is... And the claim can't progress any further. But not all VPNs are created equal. Some keep logs. And that's not good for privacy.

    For you not getting DMCA, you may use private trackers only. If not, maybe you got lucky, or you just ignored the emails from your provider or your provider doesn't follow up with complaints.

    • haroldfinch@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      But it's VPN providers who rent the servers that have downloaded the torrents. So they can basically say it's not done by us, but the users of our service, and thus they don't bear any consequences? It seems like such a good business model.

      VPN providers do not bear any responsibilities for providing services for piracy.

      The DMCA's principal innovation in the field of copyright is the exemption from direct and indirect liability of Internet service providers and other intermediaries.

      So technically if VPN providers do not keep logs, you are fine. But since it's impossible to know how VPN providers servers are implemented, still there are risks.


      I mostly use public trackers. Maybe it's just my ISP doesn't care.

      • Rivalarrival@lemmy.today
        ·
        edit-2
        2 months ago

        Plot twist: RIAA and MPAA own all the major VPN providers, and/or the data centers they rent from.

        /ConapiracyTheory

      • bastionntb@lemmy.ml
        ·
        2 months ago

        Correct. That's also why it's important to find providers thatchave passed many independant audits. Like ProtonVPN or Mulvad.

  • Fonzie!@ttrpg.network
    ·
    2 months ago

    FWIW, at least Nord and Express explicitly put on their terms and conditions that you're not allowed to use their services illegally, Nord mentions a few usages including unblocking content that should not be available in your region.

    They also give influencers like YouTubers and Twitch streamers scripts telling them to show how you can unblock content, but apparently the T&C weighs far heavier in court.

    • haroldfinch@lemmy.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Great comment. Here is an excerpt from Nord VPN's TOS

      8.2 You agree that you shall not yourself and/or enable others to: •use, assist, encourage, or enable others to use the Services/Websites for any unlawful, illicit, illegal, criminal, or fraudulent activities, including ... digital piracy ... which might negatively affect provision of our Services to other users;

      A Snippet from Express VPN"s TOS:

      In using our Services, you agree not to: ... Send, post, or transmit over the Services any content that is illegal, hateful, threatening, insulting, deceptive, or defamatory; infringes ExpressVPN or third parties’ intellectual property rights; invades privacy; or incites violence or any unlawful behavior.

  • Kairos@lemmy.today
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    ISPs turn off connectivity out of fear from lawsuits. Cox is contesting this, saying it's too much of a burden (which it is) for both them and customers to turn off internet.

    Its also fucking dangerous to do that in this day and age.

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 months ago

    If you are just torrenting and using it for downloading some stuff and nothing more, use the cheapest as NordVPN or Cyber ghost these are good for this, BUT NOT FROM A PRIVACY POINT OF VIEW

    • ayaya@lemdro.id
      ·
      2 months ago

      PIA is the best for torrents. It is $79 for 39 months which is $2.03/mo and they have port forwarding. That's less than half of pretty much every other provider.

      I have had 3 clients (one for a specific tracker, one for everything else, and an extra seedbox) going 24/7 for years with no problems. No complaints about the speeds either. I frequently saturate full gigabit on both downloads and uploads.

    • technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      ·
      edit-2
      2 months ago

      Cyberghost is untrustable.

      • https://masjidalaqsa.com/boycott/cyberghost-vpn-israel-bds
      • https://www.cnet.com/tech/services-and-software/what-is-kape-technologies-what-you-need-to-know-about-the-parent-company-of-cyberghost-vpn/
      • https://www.reddit.com/r/Express_VPN/comments/pp6lwf/former_malware_distributor_kape_technologies_now/