https://corrieredibologna.corriere.it/notizie/cultura-e-tempo-libero/24_ottobre_07/l-antropologo-emmanuel-todd-se-l-ucraina-perde-la-guerra-a-vincere-e-l-europa-ba506b61-22dc-4fb2-b9c5-9445461e7xlk.shtml

  • pinguinu [any]@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    3 months ago

    Idk, that may be a little hyperbolic. Of course you can say "it ceases to exist as a relevant military formation" but that's not what is being said. I don't see the disintegration of NATO outright, even if NATO-adverse parties get elected or neoliberals change course (which seems the more like the trajectory now). And what is certain is that the US will do whatever it can to influence Europe, which has been doing successfully since after WW2.

    • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
      hexagon
      ·
      3 months ago

      I fully expect NATO to disintegrate because NATO can only exist while the US is committed to the project. The US is increasingly pivoting to Asia now, and once the war is lost then Europe will be left holding the bag. At that point it's going to become obvious to everyone that the US is not going to protect Europe going forward. The US will do whatever it can to influence Europe, but as we're already seeing in France, Italy, Germany, Hungary, and Slovakia, the public opinion is increasingly turning against Atlanticism. This trend will only continue gaining momentum going forward, and the more established parties try to play games to stay in power the more the resentment will grow.

      • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]
        ·
        3 months ago

        NATO will keep existing precisely because US needs to force Europe to contribute more for maintenance of Western hegemony.

        • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
          hexagon
          ·
          3 months ago

          That only works as long as the Europeans think they're better off being vassals of the US rather than make peace with Russia. At the end of the day people care about their material conditions first and foremost. As the standard of living in Europe continues to collapse, the opinion is starting to shift against the US.

          • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]
            ·
            3 months ago

            European prosperity is reliant on exploitation of other countries, and this exploitation can only be maintained in collaboration with USA. For all the idiocy and pro-Western bootlicking of Russian ruling class, they wouldn't allow Europeans to exploit their country enough for Europe to maintain its quality of life.

            • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmygrad.ml
              hexagon
              ·
              3 months ago

              The USA has very little interest in European prosperity, and is currently cannibalizing European industry. The reality is that as western countries lose grip on the rest of the world, it's going to turn on one another. The US being the biggest fish in the western bloc will prey upon its vassals to bolster its own economy.

              • Collatz_problem [comrade/them]
                ·
                3 months ago

                EU understands that without the US they are certain to lose their position as the neocolonial metropoly and that their only chance is hoping that they would get some scraps for being good running dogs for the US. Anti-American opposition won't be significant until after the US loses their hegemony.

    • OrnluWolfjarl@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      3 months ago

      I think after the war in Ukraine finishes, BRICS will be evolving more and more quickly. Part of that will probably be the induction of Turkey in BRICS. If that happens, then there's a very serious possibility that the US-Turkish relations will be coming to a head. That could escalate into a series of events (which might also involve Greece), where Turkey exits or gets expelled from NATO. Turkey being the second largest military force in NATO, its exit might create serious internal issues.

      Furthermore, in the very likely scenario that Israel comes out as a loser in its current insanity, that would weaken NATO's position even further.

      In the meantime, if Russia achieves a significant victory and territorial expansion, Europe will have to find a way to co-exist with its neighbor. Western European countries will be hesitant, but eventually they'll try to reinstate diplomatic and trade relations with Russia, particularly after experiencing a long recession and inability to sustain themselves by importing expensive fuel, steel and other things from the US. They'll have no choice but to turn to the much cheaper Russian and Chinese (and perhaps decolonized African) solutions. That would mean further divergence of European foreign policy from US foreign policy.

      Eastern Europeans are a kind of wildcard, but at least some of them will decide that the new NATO is not enough to support them in a conflict, so they'll try to lower their belligerence towards Russia and normalize relations as well. Especially if Western Europe seems to be getting along with Russia, nations like Slovakia, Hungary, Romania, maybe Czechia and Poland as well, will be moving closer to Russia.

      The US might try to influence the situation in the opposite direction, but unless they do something drastic a la Nord Stream pipeline attack, they won't really be able to stem the tide. Their only other realistic option is to stoke a (proxy or limited) conflict between US and China, which will drag Europe alongside the US. And even then, it will just prolong the final outcome.