• Crikeste@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 day ago

      It’s called deescalation through escalation.

      America supports it when Israel does it, that means it’s okay.

      Iran, go right ahead. Lebanon, go right ahead. Hamas, go right ahead.

      Israel and America have already stated this is a perfectly valid reasoning. The rules of war go both ways.

      Again: If America is the world ethics, these actions are perfectly valid. This is what America does.

      • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 day ago

        This is what America does.

        Except it isn't. USA does not preemptively attack countries which plan to attack USA, since nobody is doing that. USA wrecks and coups countries because they are either trying to leave the US hegemonic control or the ones that are simply appealing targets for imperialism.

  • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    If anyone wants, here's an extremely optimistic 2009 Brookings Institute white paper on how various hostile actions against Iran would play out based off numbers and history.

    Chapter 3 analyses a "boots on the ground" invasion (the occupation would require a draft), Chapters 4-6 analyze American and Israeli airstrikes. Neither of them expect Iran to employ masses of drones or close the strait, and they consider ballistic missiles against US assets unlikely.

    While they have an extreme western bias, there's no way you can twist the numbers to look good.

    • TheLepidopterists [he/him]
      ·
      1 day ago

      Chapter 3 analyses a "boots on the ground" invasion (the occupation would require a draft)

      Good luck, I'm defecting as soon as they don't have eyes on me.

      • alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 day ago

        It makes it pretty clear how insanely unfeasible a ground invasion of Iran would be even with the most optimistic assumptions.

        1.3 million just for the occupation of an 88 million pop country, and that number just comes from other occupations, without taking into consideration the terrain or people or last 50 years of preparation for asymmetrical warfare.

  • queermunist she/her@lemmy.ml
    ·
    2 days ago

    Cool, crash the price of oil right be fore the election.

    Biden is trying to make Harris lose. He hates her for taking his job.

    • goferking0@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      1 day ago

      Biden's bitter at people realizing he's too old. Pretty sure he was hoping to go out like feinstein.

      Bibi just wants someone he can influence with shiney things rather than needing to pull strings.

      What a fantastic democracy/republic we have in the USA 😭

    • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
      ·
      1 day ago

      Because the term isn't up yet and taking him down for being unable to perform his duties would be greatly damaging to US optics-based politics.

      • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
        ·
        19 hours ago

        You're right. But how is it not damaging to US optics-based politics to have a dementia addled old man start a war with Iran?

          • BurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]
            ·
            19 hours ago

            Good point. But why does no one care about his pudding brain? I just can't understand. The whole country was like, yeah he's unfit. They after he dropped out no one cares.

            • PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml
              ·
              17 hours ago

              Peak idealism in politics. For some reason they are completely unable to think in a cathegory of system, it's all just comic book to them where colorfully dressed people run around and the rest of the grey world is a background that just happen, no agency, no reason, it just is. So despite having a really clear indication, that is completely identical politics of Biden and Harris they think problem is gone because person is gone. This didn't happen in year or 4, that was trained by long decades.

  • plinky [he/him]
    ·
    2 days ago

    Kamala could invoke 25th, if she doesn't agree with it shrug-outta-hecks

      • MachineFab812@discuss.tchncs.de
        ·
        2 days ago

        SHUT UP! Why couldn't you let him have that little bit of naivette?

        Seriously though, its a damn fine idea, if only the US and the DNC weren't totally bat-shit on this front. Why does a little thing like reality have to be so un-cooperative?

  • Teils13@lemmy.eco.br
    ·
    2 days ago

    Since i'm in south america, i will grab the popcorn and watch the gringos fighting with brown people for the nth time.