Very significant that they've actually made one that works. That's a big leap. But as far as I know, we are still years behind being able to mass produce and implement them. There's a few reasons:
They are far more energy-intensive
They generate a lot more heat. If we solve 1. we might be able to solve this to an extent.
Theoretical designs are much bigger in size to electronic chips.
Due to size constraints they can process less information than electronic chips currently. While light is faster than electrons (and wavelength modulation could be used in the future to convey more complex information than 1s and 0s), photonic chips currently have less pathways than electronic chips, so less information can be processed simultaneously.
They require constant callibration to ensure the light source and receiver are perfectly alligned. This makes them very impractical to use for the average user. Even the vibrations inside a desktop computer, due to its fans, can be a problem. They are nigh impossible to use in portable devices, industrial machinery or vehicles.
They are currently really expensive to make, but I'm guessing that's because we are still prototyping. The materials and process can actually turn out to be cheaper than electronic chips.
Yeah, there are definitely a lot of challenges ahead, but these do seem like tractable problems. It's also worth noting that we're basically reaching the limits of what silicon can do now, and photonic chips would have a lot of optimization potential for decades to come.
Absolutely, and this kind of fundamental research can only really be accomplished with state level commitment. Even in the west, much of the research into computing tech was publicly funded initially before it was handed over to the companies.
Very significant that they've actually made one that works. That's a big leap. But as far as I know, we are still years behind being able to mass produce and implement them. There's a few reasons:
They are far more energy-intensive
They generate a lot more heat. If we solve 1. we might be able to solve this to an extent.
Theoretical designs are much bigger in size to electronic chips.
Due to size constraints they can process less information than electronic chips currently. While light is faster than electrons (and wavelength modulation could be used in the future to convey more complex information than 1s and 0s), photonic chips currently have less pathways than electronic chips, so less information can be processed simultaneously.
They require constant callibration to ensure the light source and receiver are perfectly alligned. This makes them very impractical to use for the average user. Even the vibrations inside a desktop computer, due to its fans, can be a problem. They are nigh impossible to use in portable devices, industrial machinery or vehicles.
They are currently really expensive to make, but I'm guessing that's because we are still prototyping. The materials and process can actually turn out to be cheaper than electronic chips.
Yeah, there are definitely a lot of challenges ahead, but these do seem like tractable problems. It's also worth noting that we're basically reaching the limits of what silicon can do now, and photonic chips would have a lot of optimization potential for decades to come.
Agreed, I'm just saying there's still a lot of work and research ahead.
Absolutely, and this kind of fundamental research can only really be accomplished with state level commitment. Even in the west, much of the research into computing tech was publicly funded initially before it was handed over to the companies.
I hadn't considered that. Very good point comrade!