But we shouldn't, Nordic style Social Democracy is still experiencing rises in disparity and reliance on both US military presence as a peacemaker and economic Imperialism to subsidize costs.
if we try our absolute hardest to just "do scandinavia" we will only get one step forward three steps back. you can count on reactionary capitalist claw back of any progress, the only long term solution is to defeat the capitalist class and remove their dictatorship. not beg them to give us tiny scraps from their extravagant buffet.
Since nobody agrees with terminology, we might as well just say: we should do Scandinavia
But we shouldn't, Nordic style Social Democracy is still experiencing rises in disparity and reliance on both US military presence as a peacemaker and economic Imperialism to subsidize costs.
Read "Riding the wave" about how scandinavia relies on imperialism to function.
deleted by creator
if we try our absolute hardest to just "do scandinavia" we will only get one step forward three steps back. you can count on reactionary capitalist claw back of any progress, the only long term solution is to defeat the capitalist class and remove their dictatorship. not beg them to give us tiny scraps from their extravagant buffet.
Social democracy is objectively the moderate wing of fascism
deleted by creator
Do you mean their economy and policies, or their people? In either case, I agree.
deleted by creator
Read the comment that I replied to. It does not say "have", but "do".
deleted by creator
The two cases were "do (meaning 'emulate') their economy and policies" and "do (meaning 'have sex with') their people". No "have" anywhere.
deleted by creator