• Lemmykoopa@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    11 hours ago

    Cities can be leveled, neighborhoods turned to pulp, without nuclear weapons being used. Like what happened to Grozny. You can't walk back a nuke, but everyone not in that city can survive a city being shelled to oblivion.

    • darkcalling@lemmygrad.ml
      ·
      edit-2
      8 hours ago

      Russia cannot win against NATO without nukes without taking horrendous and unacceptable losses among their people in a way that would besides extinguishing lives derail their economy. This is a fact admitted by all sides.

      I say fuck that. Let the NATOids die instead. >>IF<< they field their armies Russia should hit them and let those scum burn in nuclear fire. They should hit their formations and what bases they can not located in city centers.

      I have no idea where you get this stuff. No one is suggesting Russia target cities instead of military centers.

      I’m not even suggesting moving to nuclear weapons unless conventional strikes by Russia on NATO (in retaliation let’s remember for NATO directly striking Russia with long range missiles that Biden has just approved) lead to NATO escalating by getting more involved. Russia has to show resolve. Stand by its red lines. Stand by its repeated warnings and show the west it isn’t a paper tiger.

      Who wants to walk back? This ends one of two ways. We win with Russia winning or we lose with Russia losing. Time is running out. Climate change is a ticking bomb that will kill more than a dozen nuclear weapons.

      Commit all the way. We must hope Russia has resolve. The implications as I mentioned are far reaching for the proletariat everywhere. For anti-imperialist forces.