• robinn2
    ·
    edit-2
    10 months ago

    deleted by creator

    • Sprinklebump@lemm.ee
      ·
      10 months ago

      to the false narrative of Bolshevik betrayal and anarchist victimhood which she is attempting to create.

      Do you have any evidence that this is false or do you just not like it?

      Alls I hear is a lot of what aboutism.

      "Emma goldman is writing about anarchist being murdered but whatabout the the bad things anarchists did? "

      Emma goldman was a russia born anarchist critiquing The USSR.

      Are you going to respond the to claims they are making or are you going to cherry pick out the racist stuff?

      We can stop honeslty. if you believe that anarchism is eurofacism we have very little to talk about.

      • robinn2
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        deleted by creator

        • Sprinklebump@lemm.ee
          ·
          10 months ago

          God I hate that term.

          Yeah the racist Republicans in the US use whataboutism all the time to skirt around actual critiques. They really hate it when you call them out on it

          Did anarchist attack and kill communists during that time period? Yes. Does that make thier critiques about soviet authoritarianism invalid or make emma Goldman letters false. No. It just means there is nuance in history.

          I dont categorically support emma goldman. And Im not surprised they said some racist things. Thats why I am able to separate the good things they did while critizing the bad.

          You should try it!

          It is a known fact that the USSR consolidated power within russia after the october revolution. They killed and jailed anarchists and many other opossing groups.

          And when lenin died and stalin took over, he did it too. This is what large goverments must do to maintain power.

          The fact that you can't admit that means you a defintiately a tankie.

          By merely mentioning an informal fallacy I have torn your argument asunder! You are the one who has proven nothing.

          You sound like a jackass when you write this way. imo.

          • robinn2
            ·
            edit-2
            10 months ago

            deleted by creator