What use to be the PPA that allowed Ubuntu users to use native .deb packages for Firefox has recently changed to the same meta package that forces installation of Snap and the Firefox snap package.

I am having to remove the meta package, then re-uninstall the snap firefox, then re-uninstall Snap, then install pin the latest build I could get (firefox_116.0.3+build2-0ubuntu0.22.04.1~mt1_arm64.deb) to keep the native firefox build.

I'm so done with Ubuntu.

    • library_napper@monyet.cc
      ·
      1 year ago

      For one, packages aren't cryptographically verified after downloading them, as is done with apt.

      This is a massive security vulnerability.

        • library_napper@monyet.cc
          ·
          1 year ago

          Your link is just guesses on a forum.

          Link me to the official documentation that describes how signatures work.

          • cmeerw@programming.dev
            ·
            1 year ago

            You mean like https://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/jammy/en/man8/snap.8.html

            Still better than a random user claiming

            This is a massive security vulnerability

            with no justification whatsoever.

            • library_napper@monyet.cc
              ·
              1 year ago

              That's usage documentation. It doesn't describe how snap verifies packages.

              The burden of proof lies with the program's docs to prove their security. In the absence of such documentation, we should all ageree to distrust it as insecure.

              Apt clearly documents how the manifest file is cryptographically signed with PGP (and if that Sig or the signed hashes dont for any package it refuses to continue).

    • lily33@lemm.ee
      ·
      1 year ago

      While I'm sure some people hate snap in general, most people simply hate being forced to use it. Or rather, bring forced to switch distro and reinstall everything.

    • nestEggParrot@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      1 year ago

      Many have issues with stability. Especially with firefox which comes installed via snap on ubuntu. Similarly compared to deb snaps versions occasionally have weird bugs. I personaaly had an issue with opening files properly using snap but worked fine on deb.

      Also its unnecessarily forced. Deb works great and apt is widely used as primary package manager. No need to maintain the system with another one in the mix.

      Its also repoted not to work well on otknr platforms like fedora or arch. Other package formats like AppImage, flatpak might be better in that regard though I havent used them.

    • ennemi [he/him]
      ·
      1 year ago

      Digital sanity. I do not want any of my tools to constantly beg to be updated.