Do you guys have higher tolerance to buggy bs? Are you all gaslighting people to get higher adoption? Does it just work? If so... How??
I've tried about every distro in multiple different laptops/desktops, amd gpus, basically every possible idea and there's always weird ass bugs and issues and a ton of involuntary learning involved.
edit. Any chances you guys could suggest me one setup that "just works" no ifs and no buts? Or does it not exist in the Linux world?
edit2. Since people are asking for specifics I'm going to pick one random distro I've tried recently and list the issues I've had:
- On Arch fresh install with archinstall, everything default pmuch:
Immediately greeted with this. thread discussing it here.
I could live with that though, kinda...
Gnome apps in Arch are taking multiple seconds to open/tab back into and freezing, no idea how to debug it.
Could also live with it...
The killer one is that the battery life just sucks badly. about 15W idling with tlp, for comparison Debian with tlp gives me sub 5Watts. But again, Debian comes with a whole different set of issues.
I've only listed the one I've tried most recently, but the experience is similar with all distros I've tried.
I have been using Linux for nearly a decade and I'm too scared to try Arch. It's not for beginners.
Depends on what you're beginning.
The risk of forgetting some critical part of the install is mostly mitigated by arch-install. Arch is one of the easiest to "learn the ecosystem" since all packages are delivered to you as the author wrote them, so your first time through is a chore, but afterwards you can pretty easily replicate what you land on.
There's a lot more decisions made for you in other distros, ultimately I found it frustrating to work backwards trying to understand what those were the more polished they came.
It is however; the absolute last place I'd point someone who didn't want to or did not have the time, no matter how good the arch wiki is: it doesn't read itself.