cross-posted from: https://lemmy.crimedad.work/post/12162

Why? Because apparently they need some more incentive to keep units occupied. Also, even though a property might be vacant, there's still imputed rental income there. Its owner is just receiving it in the form of enjoying the unit for himself instead of receiving an actual rent check from a tenant. That imputed rent ought to be taxed like any other income.

    • ATQ@lemm.ee
      ·
      10 months ago

      Oh, so you just want the state to be your landlord? Enjoy your cinderblock gulag.

        • bagend
          ·
          edit-2
          10 months ago

          deleted by creator

        • ATQ@lemm.ee
          ·
          10 months ago

          You can rent from someone else. That’s actually easier than moving cities, states, or countries.

            • ATQ@lemm.ee
              ·
              edit-2
              10 months ago

              If you want to argue that the government should develop low cost housing, that’s an interesting discussion. In general, “supply” regardless of how it’s created, is the answer to high housing prices. I do fear that you’ll be dissatisfied with the quality of that government housing.

              • The_Jewish_Cuban [he/him]
                ·
                10 months ago

                No it's not. That's why you have houses and apartments for hypothetical millionaires going empty because no one can actually afford them. As long as homes and real estate have speculative value there is no guarantee that "supply" will positively affect prices or affect them enough to provide housing for everyone.

                The simple fact that there are more empty homes and apartments than there are homeless people disproves your premise.

            • Honytawk@lemmy.zip
              ·
              10 months ago

              Yes, Socialism has home ownership.

              The only thing that is state affiliated more than in Capitalism is the mean of production (businesses) being owned by the state. Everything else is still owned by individuals.

              You are thinking of Communism.

          • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
            ·
            10 months ago

            In the west all of your children have the freedom to grow up as homeless crack heads living in tent cities, how inspiring.

              • ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                10 months ago

                now compare the amount of homeless people in both, also you linked the same article twice

                btw now you have edited your article remind me, is russia a socilaist country or a neo-liberal one, like the USA?

                you have linked me info of Russian from 2010-present, in what way am I remotely suggesting a capitalist, neo-liberal country is what im adovcating for?

                  • bagend
                    ·
                    edit-2
                    10 months ago

                    deleted by creator

                      • Thordros [he/him, comrade/them]
                        ·
                        10 months ago

                        I think it's pretty hilarious that you assume everybody opposed to capitalism is Russian, and use that as a counter-example for why "communism" is failing today.

                        Did history stop for you in 1991 or something? The neoliberals won; Russia has been a hyper-capitalist abomination living in the corpse of the USSR for over three decades now. Why would we care that Russia sucks? Everybody knows it sucks now.

                        • came_apart_at_Kmart [he/him, comrade/them]
                          ·
                          10 months ago

                          "socialism is when you're in russia. the more russia you are in, the more socialism is what's wrong america #1 football hotdog toby keith." - the diabetic gym teacher who taught this guy's social studies class.

                      • keepcarrot [she/her]
                        ·
                        10 months ago

                        I've read and re-read this thread... Do you think Russia is currently communist? Like... Putin is a communist, the United Russia Party is communist etc etc. Is this actually your belief?

          • panopticon [comrade/them]
            ·
            10 months ago

            them up and force them to fight for our Moscovi overlords that are just a itsy-bitsy more equal than the rest of u

            Nice whataboutism you tankie! Centrist liberal tankie!!!

            Western countries already provide resources for our less fortunate friends and neighbors

            Lol. Lmao even

            • ATQ@lemm.ee
              ·
              10 months ago

              It’s true. That’s why our homelessness incidence are less than 10% of yours. Maybe that’s why you’re trying to drive yours down by conscripting your homeless and forcing them into “former glory” wars?

      • uralsolo
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        deleted by creator

      • UlyssesT [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        10 months ago

        Oh, so you just want the state to be your landlord? Enjoy your cinderblock gulag.

        bootlicker

      • Nicklybear [she/her]
        ·
        10 months ago

        As someone who has been homeless, I would MUCH rather live my entire life in a "cinderblock gulag" then spend even a second homeless. So, yes, if we ever were to get such buildings provided to us from the government, I would greatly enjoy them.

      • Catradora_Stalinism [she/her, comrade/them]
        ·
        10 months ago

        sis, I would love living in a small apartment complex where everything is either five minutes away or easily accessed by public transportation

        I would love being in an environment that promotes a collective spirit where people spend more time outside than inside

        I would love having housing be 4% AT MOST of my monthly paycheck

        but we gotta have idiots with trillions because they deserve to hang us out to dry, is that it?