• Garibaldee@lemm.ee
    hexagon
    ·
    edit-2
    5 days ago

    It is topical, you would know that if you read the article as declassified files were released in 2024, that showed Ethel was not a spy, no one is arguing her husband wasn't a spy, so yes it is relevant to ask for a posthumous pardon after evidence was revealed this year that she had nothing to do with it and the government at the time knew that, but chose to execute her anyways.

    https://morningstaronline.co.uk/article/declassified-memo-proves-ethel-rosenberg-was-not-soviet-spy

    An NSA codebreaker’s 1950 assessment reveals Ethel Rosenberg knew of her husband’s espionage but ‘did not engage in the work herself’ — despite this, the US sent her to die in the electric chair, writes ANDREW TUCKER

    • ExtremeDullard@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      edit-2
      5 days ago

      I know... I'm not saying it's not important. In fact, it's supremely important to expose the truth about our dysfunctional state agencies, even three quarters of a century after the fact.

      I know...

      But really, Trump v2 and the fast unrolling of the American Reich really puts the Rosenbergs on the back burner. We have much more grave and pressing problems right now and this is not helping.

      • Kumikommunism [they/them]
        ·
        5 days ago

        The fact that you think pardoning someone decades later and "stopping fascism" would involve the same people doing the same work means you don't know much at all about either of them.

        The state institutions that you and all of your elected leaders love so much both killed the Rosenbergs and pardoned Trump for the exact same reasons. They aren't "dysfunctional". They are doing their jobs quite well.