Their argument (or rather chatgpt's argument) is basically that there's heavy moderation but I took a look at the for you page and the exodees love the moderation. I really don't get what forbes is complaining about. There's rules to live in society.
Someone said they were doxxed on Instagram and meta never did anything about it but on rednote someone called them a slur and their account got deleted within the hour.
In a nutshell, they're complaining about losing control of the narrative. To their great chagrin, they see that people don't give a fuck about the fact that the platform is moderated, and they're embracing it. They spent decades telling people that freeze peach is more important than material conditions, and now people are rejecting this message.
Their argument (or rather chatgpt's argument) is basically that there's heavy moderation but I took a look at the for you page and the exodees love the moderation. I really don't get what forbes is complaining about. There's rules to live in society.
Someone said they were doxxed on Instagram and meta never did anything about it but on rednote someone called them a slur and their account got deleted within the hour.
My understanding is that xiaohongshu bad because they can't use it to spread fake news, aka le democratic values™.
Also funnily says that tiktok is a free battleground for ideas but doesn't mention why the US gov is banning it, only that "ze market is closing".
In a nutshell, they're complaining about losing control of the narrative. To their great chagrin, they see that people don't give a fuck about the fact that the platform is moderated, and they're embracing it. They spent decades telling people that freeze peach is more important than material conditions, and now people are rejecting this message.