• zephyreks@programming.dev
    ·
    1 year ago

    Except, it's really not. Your quote from the Wikipedia article is unsubstantiated conjecture with no source that supports the claim.

    There's a reason Wikipedia isn't acceptable for academic papers: it's factually incorrect often enough to be a problem. It's specifically a problem for non-Western content because the vast majority of Wikipedia contributors speak English as their dominant (and often only) language and thus can only ever use English secondary or tertiary sources.