So maybe we should not post editorialized headlines from bad articles in a language we don't speak from the worst rag in the lands.
Otherwise people might not notice that the lead headline (in German) "What particularly tormented Scholz" does not get answered in this article. They might not consider that Scholz is "tormented" just because Bild doesn't like him
"Something bothers me more than the talks: He (Putin) is not complaining about all the sanctions. I don’t know if he did that in conversation with you. But he didn’t even mention the sanctions.”
This is from the translation that you posted ^
"what particularly tormented scholz" is that putin didn't complain about the sanctions. It is answered in the article. Is the headline sensationalized? yes. But thats typical journalism for you if you stop posting sensationalized headlines there won't be any news on lemmy.
all bourgeois media is almost entirely garbage, you have to sift through the propagandistic rhetoric to extract the potential useful parts
So maybe we should not post editorialized headlines from bad articles in a language we don't speak from the worst rag in the lands.
Otherwise people might not notice that the lead headline (in German) "What particularly tormented Scholz" does not get answered in this article. They might not consider that Scholz is "tormented" just because Bild doesn't like him
that's fair enough, particularly the lack of an official English translation
This is from the translation that you posted ^ "what particularly tormented scholz" is that putin didn't complain about the sanctions. It is answered in the article. Is the headline sensationalized? yes. But thats typical journalism for you if you stop posting sensationalized headlines there won't be any news on lemmy.
Is being bothered the same as being tormented? Breaking news: Scholz visably close to tears multiple times