..And when you have no defense left, you just use hyperboles. If someone says "this specific thing could be the CIA's fault" and bringing up said thing makes you feel icky icky, you'll go to another thread and say "They think EVERYTHING'S the CIA's fault!" You do this knowingly, on purpose. It's an anger reflex. You desperately need your pointless internet accusation to stick, so you puff up what the leftist/radical said until you can confidently call it false. Liberals who know theyre liberals have a million Alternative ways of framing arguments, so they can warp them into a fake "fact-checking" kind of scrutiny without technically sounding dishonest (doesnt work lol, we read). It's interesting bc it really hints at how your ideology itself is heavily propped up by capital and literally violently obselete.
Stop doing this. You know what I mean. All of it - drop the act. It's not interesting or funny enough to justify sinking time into.
..And when you have no defense left, you just use hyperboles. If someone says "this specific thing could be the CIA's fault" and bringing up said thing makes you feel icky icky, you'll go to another thread and say "They think EVERYTHING'S the CIA's fault!" You do this knowingly, on purpose. It's an anger reflex. You desperately need your pointless internet accusation to stick, so you puff up what the leftist/radical said until you can confidently call it false. Liberals who know theyre liberals have a million Alternative ways of framing arguments, so they can warp them into a fake "fact-checking" kind of scrutiny without technically sounding dishonest (doesnt work lol, we read). It's interesting bc it really hints at how your ideology itself is heavily propped up by capital and literally violently obselete.
Stop doing this. You know what I mean. All of it - drop the act. It's not interesting or funny enough to justify sinking time into.