Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agofixed cyberghost's "meme"imagemessage-square895 fedilinkarrow-up1507
arrow-up1507imagefixed cyberghost's "meme"Vuraniute@thelemmy.club to Memes@lemmy.ml • 1 year agomessage-square895 Commentsfedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear18·1 year agoWhat makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others? link
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workshexbear4·1 year agoThat it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent. linkfedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear17·1 year agoIs benefiting others morally justifiable? link
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear18·1 year agoWhat is the moral justification for your answer? link
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workshexbear4·1 year agoIt's actually axiomatic. I can't really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy. linkfedilink
minus-squareBurgerPunk [he/him, comrade/them]hexbear18·1 year agoThis is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy link
minus-squareJohnDClay@sh.itjust.workshexbear3·1 year agoLook up axioms. You'll see they are the staring points of logical arguments. linkfedilink
Not always but in this case
What makes it morally justifiable in this case but not others?
That it is benefiting those involved instead of being to their determent.
Is benefiting others morally justifiable?
Yes
What is the moral justification for your answer?
It's actually axiomatic. I can't really prove or justify why one should be good or bad, or why they should be good or bad to one another. But that good is good and to be strived for is the staring point of the philosophy.
This is an appeal to the one true scotsman fallacy
Look up axioms. You'll see they are the staring points of logical arguments.