I understand that the west has ridiculously high levels of propaganda against the DPRK but how do Communists argue with the fact that there is clearly some kind of family line to the leader role?

hotwarioinyourarea [he/him] · 10 months ago

I understand that the west has ridiculously high levels of propaganda against the DPRK but how do Communists argue with the fact that there is clearly some kind of family line to the leader role?

SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml · 10 months ago

Wrong!

DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml · 10 months ago

Hey, if privileged westerners declare their version of socialism invalid, who are we to argue? They're clearly world experts on this and everyone else should automatically defer to them when it comes to socialist states passing the purity test. (Not saying the person above you is like that, just that they're channeling that energy)

SovereignState@lemmygrad.ml · edit-2 10 months ago

The idea that the DPRK 'abandoned' Marxism-Leninism bugs the crap out of me. Marxism-Leninism is a scientific methodology that must adapt to suit the material needs of each nation. I remain unconvinced of any differences between the DPRK's political economy and other AES states so drastic to warrant the claim that the DPRK is not a Marxist-Leninist (scientific socialist) nation.

DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml · 10 months ago

Yeah, it reeks of western chauvinism, there's a lot of overlap between the "they aren't real AES" and "I uncritically parrot western claims about their government being a monarchy"

Or the standard ultra tactic of just dismissing them out of hand for not being "pure" enough because their material conditions aren't ideal and they've had to make compromises.