• purahna@lemmygrad.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    right? It says so much that all the people who hate communism are the ones who's businesses and family wealth were hurt - you will be looking for a while before you find an average person who lived under communism who hates communism.

  • Seeker of Carcosa@feddit.uk
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    The good old Narcissist's Tankie's Prayer:

    That didn't happen,

    And if it did, it wasn't that bad,

    And if it was, that's not a big deal,

    And if it is, that's not my fault,

    And if it was, that's Western propaganda,

    And if it isn't, you deserved it.

        • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          Because they intentionally destroyed resources to fight collectivization (ie throwing a tantrum to avoid having to share with people with less than them), which while the process was admittedly mishandled ended up being a good thing in the long run.

          Also I'm not just going to believe a Wikipedia article that anyone with even slightly more than others was labled a Kulak anyway.

            • autismdragon [he/him, they/them]
              ·
              1 year ago

              It wasn't caused by collectivization and I said "the long run".

              That famine was the last one in the region. There had been famines in the region during the czar's time frequently.

            • Bobby_DROP_TABLES [he/him]
              ·
              1 year ago

              It wasn't a famine, Stalin literally ate all of the food single-handedly with his massive spoon. Tankies like you will deny this.