Edit: As of five minutes ago, I am aware that there is no official ui for the elgato stream deck which is a huge disservice to the users of this expensive piece of hardware. I was under the impression that streamdeck-ui was the official (and very outdated) official version, which is false. Those who bothered to explain this, thank you very much. To those piling up on someone who just hasn't as much knowledge as you do: feels bad man. Maybe consider that this is not reddit and schooling someone does not have to be aggressive.

Hi folks!

I have switched to my Linux daily driver this week and after some starting issues, it's working quite well.

But a few bits and bobs are quite annoying, such as streamdeck ui. The windows version looks and feels like a spaceship compared to the barebones version I have on ubuntu 23.04

Here's what the windows version looks like.

Show

Additionally, the windows version has plugins and stuff that pretty much make giant scripts that can do pretty much anything and everything. The Linux version doesn't even have it's own pictures that come with it.

If you're curious I just used apt install streamdeck-ui instead of the complex stuff that is on the web (and doesn't work anymore because outdated).

Am I just using a really outdated version or is the linux version just trash?

TL;DR: Linux version of streamdeck ui looks 20 yrs old while the windows version looks like photoshop.

Thanks for reading. Have a good one!

  • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
    hexagon
    ·
    1 year ago

    Now I agree on all points. I actually have had no issues configuring linux server for the past two years and I probably just assumed the desktop variant would be as mature as the server variant. On top came the drastically different ui. And yes, community devs are very approachable. I have solved a lot of issues with minecraft servers that way, thanks to those devs.

    Just so you know, these are the reasons I assumed linux is in most parts on par with windows, ui wise:

    • firefox = non distinguishable from windows imo
    • vs code = non distinguishable
    • libre office = looks a bit older than ms office 2013 but is insanely responsive and works like a charm
    • linphone = looks and works very good
    • steam = looks the same and is a lot faster than on windows
    • element desktop = looks and feels the same
    • obs = same
    • blender = same

    These are 8 pieces of software that were mindblowingly good. Three of them are for profit afaik (but still open source) VS Code, Linphone, Element. Steam I think is closed. Imagine the shock I then had when installing streamdeck. All others are 99% on par (and some better) than windows.

    I'm definitely impressed with Linux. I just don't think it is helpful to dogpile on someone who is asking questions instead of just informing them. That is ultimately what a forum is for afaik.

    • RandomLegend [He/Him]@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      ·
      1 year ago

      Blender, obs, firefox, element, libreoffice all have big open source backgrounds and philosophies. Steam just went full on linux mode with the steamdeck - So that those all look and feel fantastic are no wonder. VS Code; Obvious aswell - Linux is the most popular OS to program on and even Microsoft uses it... so that they make a nice version of it also no wonder. Linphone, idk

      But all of these comes from big markets and the companies you listed here (besides microsoft and steam) are the "alternative". Firefox the alternative to chrome, element to discord, etc.

      The streamdeck, is a niche market. It's not used by "that" many people. Yes it's popular, but far far far away from being as often used as firefox for example. So that the company that has closed-source backgrounds in a niche market where literally no alternative exists doesn't provide a nice UI for the alternative OS.... no wonder.

      And btw, you were dogpiled on because you called the project trash... Not because you were asking yourself why it doesn't look as good as on windows.

      • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
        hexagon
        ·
        1 year ago

        Thanks for elaborating. That makes sense.

        And in the last part comes what I don’t understand. I never called the project trash, even before editing. I asked if it was trash or I was missing something (which I was, and someone could have just said so).

        I assumed (wrongly) that is was abandonware or something since it literally looked like the windows version stripped of all but basic functionality.

        And this is why people don’t like to come to computer centric, and especially linux centric communities. Being frustrated and maybe even out of line does not give anyone the right to dogpile.

          • Haui@discuss.tchncs.de
            hexagon
            ·
            1 year ago

            Thanks. It actually means a lot to me that you get me to an extent. I was born like this. My thinking is harshly different and most people agree with me after long winded explanation but the initial reaction is often hostile. It even gets to a point where people get violent. These days more emotionally but also physically when I was young. It's how I experience autism.