archived link https://web.archive.org/web/20230928010556/https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Yaroslav_Hunka

  • Serdan@lemm.ee
    ·
    1 year ago

    https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Yaroslav_Hunka

    The general sentiment seems to be heavily in favor of either keeping the article as is, or rewriting it to be about the event.

    It's interesting how Wikipedia is accused of bias from all sides, by people who can't be bothered to figure out how it works.

      • TWeaK@lemm.ee
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        No. Because, for whatever reason, the person who first decided to write an article chose to write it about the person instead of the event.

        You could write an article yourself if you wanted.

      • Serdan@lemm.ee
        ·
        1 year ago

        The article about the person is still up.

        https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_process

        Someone proposed deletion due to the subject not being notable. The next step is finding a consensus.

        Currently it looks to me like the article gets to remain as is.

        This is what I mean by not bothering to understand how it works.