• PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
    ·
    1 year ago

    The US has a lot of criticism that can be leveled at it, but "paper tiger" certainly isn't one.

      • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
        ·
        1 year ago

        If what the US did to Vietnam and Cambodia over 20+ years is a "paper tiger" then uh, I don't think a real tiger exists.

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            I guess if killing 1million+ Vietnamese is something a "paper tiger" does sure the US is a "paper tiger."

            • OurToothbrush@lemmy.mlM
              ·
              1 year ago

              Yes. This isn't call of duty where the goal is to kill as many people as possible. The US got its ass kicked.

              • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                Yes I get it. The US lost the Vietnam war. The issue is that a "paper tiger" doesn't kill 1million+ people. Losing a war doesn't mean you are a paper tiger.

                Is Hamas also a paper tiger? Russia? Israel?

          • PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml
            ·
            1 year ago

            So paper tiger's kill 1million+ people and then someone else's capital city is renamed? Is the US the only "paper tiger" to ever exist? I figured the expression would be much older then the US.