The actual correct answer IMO is that since the Eucharist isn't cannibalism (while it has the essential characteristics of being the body of Christ it is not human flesh) it shouldn't be considered meat. Plus I think Jesus saying "take ye, and eat" counts as consent.
edit: Jesus is basically that cow thing from "Restaurant at the End of the Universe".
I'm going to be honest, I don't completely understand the difference between what Catholics say and what Anglicans, or Lutherans, or some Reformed Christians say in regards to the Eucharist.
From what I can tell they are all saying basically the same thing but a bit differently.
It's not vegan if you are a catholic but vegan if you are a protestant.
I thought this was a joke at first but then I thought about it for a minute. This is the correct answer, I think.
The actual correct answer IMO is that since the Eucharist isn't cannibalism (while it has the essential characteristics of being the body of Christ it is not human flesh) it shouldn't be considered meat. Plus I think Jesus saying "take ye, and eat" counts as consent.
edit: Jesus is basically that cow thing from "Restaurant at the End of the Universe".
It doesnt feel like it's vegan to eat a cow that was generically engineered to want to die to be turned to meat though...
I certainly wouldn't eat it. It would be a good struggle session though.
Ok yeah THIS is the correct answer lol
I'm going to be honest, I don't completely understand the difference between what Catholics say and what Anglicans, or Lutherans, or some Reformed Christians say in regards to the Eucharist.
From what I can tell they are all saying basically the same thing but a bit differently.