• Corgana@startrek.website
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    You're saying that banning eugenics is an overreaction to the eugenics war? Because there's no evidence that genetic modification was banned in general.

    • 📛Maven@lemmy.sdf.org
      ·
      9 months ago

      I feel like you're actively choosing not to read what I said, because literally the entire point of that post that I'm not saying that.

      I'm saying banning all forms of genetic engineering is an overreaction to the Eugenics War. Not all genetic engineering is eugenics. Like any medical technology, when used wisely, it can be invaluable in helping people and improving their lives. The Earth was so traumatized by the results of eugenics that centuries later, they still mandate the entire Federation throw out the baby with the bathwater.

    • Taleya@aussie.zone
      ·
      9 months ago

      DS9 clarifies this a bit:

      DNA resequencing for any reason other than repairing serious birth defects is illegal. Any genetically enhanced human being is barred from serving in Starfleet or practising medicine.

      And in regards to the ban:

      Two hundred years ago we tried to improve the species through DNA resequencing, and what did we get for our trouble? The Eugenics Wars. For every Julian Bashir that can be created, there's a Khan Singh waiting in the wings. A superhuman whose ambition and thirst for power have been enhanced along with his intellect. The law against genetic engineering provides a firewall against such men