• Chetzemoka@startrek.website
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    I think this is important context that you don't see in that press release (and which is why I would advise the community to favor posting studies more than news reports):

    "Our findings appear to differ from those of recent randomized controlled trials, which assessed the effect of very high dose vitamin C in patients with sepsis."

    This is one 30-person trial in a sea of trials that have been pretty equivocal so far regarding high dose vitamin C in sepsis.

    Also, as a critical care nurse, I'd probably be inclined to advise against using 24 hour urine output as a primary endpoint. Not that I'm saying we're not perfect! (Lol) But there are those days when everything is so busy that the exact urine count isn't the highest priority. Sometimes the urine output number sits in the back of your head with a binary "enough" or "not enough" tag and you might miss putting one of the times you emptied the urine bag into the computer.

    I don't love that, but the state of hospital staffing and having extremely ill human beings trying real hard to die on you sometimes forces you to prioritize things that are all important. And of the important things, as long as urine output exceeds the "enough" threshold, it's not the most important important thing.

    Not every day will be so swamped that it forces that kind of compromise, so the numbers will average out over the course of a few days, which appears to be reflected in this study.

    The actual study, for reference: https://ccforum.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13054-023-04644-x