This makes a scary amount of sense. The only solution I see out of this dilemma is if we have A.I. doing everything for us, and somehow making everything we want out of "nothing". That's nothing other than utopian, liberal, tech-bro logic.

But the "anarcho-primitivist" society seems to be nothing other than the tribes of old, who, mind you, are what gave rise to today's ecocidal society. The primitive communist tribes, for thousands of years, fought and killed each other, and when they discovered agriculture, their ability to do so expanded exponentially. The only possible solution can be a unified world "tribe". Or, like, what am I missing here?

I have no answers for the questions Ziq poses. But their ideal society seems just as deadly and dangerous to live in as the alternative they criticize.

  • LibsEatPoop2 [he/him]
    hexagon
    ·
    4 years ago

    Do read the article. It has a lot of clear criticisms of "Stalinists" and "Red Anarchists" alike.