tbh i’m just overly critical of deleuze because i already have a hard time caring about anything and prioritizing caring about something over accomplishing what i care about sounds like a fun way to lose the rest of the things i care about.

I am having a difficult time articulating my thoughts on this part. Caring doesn't have to be such a zero-sum circumstance, one care does not necessarily have to be at the expense of another. Perhaps some of these cares are not "cares" at all, and perhaps no-action is the proper response? I am trying not to just tell you to "check your priorities" or something unhelpful like that but the words aren't really coming to me.

Edit: also where does it end? if my desire is to desire things would accomplishing desiring things be counted as pleasure and thus reterritoralization?

Deterritorialization and Reterritorialization both happen simultaneously as two faces of the same process. When something is removed from its previous territory it is reterritorialized to reflect its change in state. So "accomplishing desiring things" would deterritorialize "desiring things" from the territory of a desire, and reterritorialize it into the territory of an accomplishment (or pleasure.)

Also part of the problem might be that i’m just a normie nerd that is no fun and doesn’t have any conception of non-typical physics, “metaphysics” just means “pseudoscience” to me dumdum brain

As someone with a very abstractly-wired brain: :shrug-outta-hecks: