an anarchist reaction would be largely the same. the difference is that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" would be established only when and as needed and when there was no threat, it would be dismantled at all other times.
The US structures of city -> county -> state -> nation would be a good example of a functional anarchistic structure if not for the supremacy doctrine that reverses the priority of power.
TBH I'm not sure what the right move would be if a neighboring community started being oppressive and reactionary, my instinct is that the neighbors band together and stomp it out. but if it started happening under a participatory democratic system (not just voting on everything but real consensus discussion) I think it may just be that anarchism has failed.
an anarchist reaction would be largely the same. the difference is that the "dictatorship of the proletariat" would be established only when and as needed and when there was no threat, it would be dismantled at all other times.
The US structures of city -> county -> state -> nation would be a good example of a functional anarchistic structure if not for the supremacy doctrine that reverses the priority of power.
TBH I'm not sure what the right move would be if a neighboring community started being oppressive and reactionary, my instinct is that the neighbors band together and stomp it out. but if it started happening under a participatory democratic system (not just voting on everything but real consensus discussion) I think it may just be that anarchism has failed.
I did not know that (some?) Anarchists also support the dictatorship of the proletariat. Thank you for taking the time to explain.