• raven [he/him]
    ·
    edit-2
    4 years ago

    It's up to date and very stable.

    Did you just read some memes about arch and apply that level of understanding to all rolling release distros?

    • headr00m [he/him]
      ·
      4 years ago

      No.

      Manjaro's governance is beyond awful, and someone who cannot fish out a broken dependency shouldn't be using arch based distros for actual work.

      • raven [he/him]
        ·
        edit-2
        4 years ago

        That's cool. I recommended something that I use every day, and have others who are not great with computers running it as well, again, with zero issues. I support those computers, and knowing that I would be supporting them I recommended something that I use and am familiar with, and have had no issues with.

        I stated my experience and nothing further, which has been nothing but positive. I don't really care what manjaro's governance looks like TBH. The distro they put out has, for me, been a very stable configurable system.
        I don't deserve to be browbeaten for recommending the "wrong" distro.

        • Pirate [none/use name]
          hexagon
          ·
          4 years ago

          It's all good and there is nothing wrong with recommending Manjaro. When I do I just mention it's a rolling release and what might come with that.

        • headr00m [he/him]
          ·
          4 years ago

          I'm sorry for making you feel that way.

          I run a small tech support group and most of the linux issues I deal with are from people who shot themselves in the foot early in the process (typically by picking a bleeding edge distro) and were fine for a few months before things came crashing down.

          I maintain that for the average user they should stay well away from anything arch based. The problems that model solves are non-issues for daily driver systems, and the problems it can very easily introduce are myriad for someone who doesn't already have an intermediate level of system knowledge.