It rhymes. In a bad way.

KDE. Because of its simplicity. Unsarcastically.

Short answer: yes, and that's a good thing.

Slightly longer answer: it's a sign of maturity for the most popular distributions and of the platforms at large. Innovation tends to happen in the fringes. Being it free software, someone can always fork the software and add their new ideas to the mix.

Nowadays I'm trying omnivore.app, also Feeder on Android and Pocket for good measure.

If I teach them, they'll find it boring. Better to be a role model and answer questions if they have them.

I don't use Wayland. I can. I've tried, but I went back to X. On Wayland, when I take a Firefox tab out of a window to make it it's own window, there's a pause of over a second until the new window appears. It drives me crazy every time. On X it's instantaneous.

I don't use two monitors, I don't use Nvidia. For everything else I use my computer for, I haven't found an advantage of using Wayland over X. So, I'll stay on X until I'm forced to change, I guess.

Sayonara.

I have a Kobo Clara which is nice for reading and a Kindle Scribe which is nice for writing. Actually I wanted to get (and still want to get at some point) the Supernote A5X, but it's difficult and expensive to get where I live.

Nowadays KDE.

Usually they update automatically. I have AppImage integration and most packages tell me of newer versions.

Because it's better.

Because it's open source.

Because it's not based on Chromium and competition is good.

And also because TabStash.

I'm grateful to be able to use AppImages for everything that's not in the repos or for anything that I need updated as soon as upstream updates. So far it has worked seamlessly. It's the most user friendly solution of the lot and I don't need sandboxing.

Tab Stash.

I have always opted in.

It's ok, if you're willing to read the Forum once in a while and inform yourself before applying upgrades.