This tweet doesn't enforce any of those points in your narrative. "War journalist has worked with feds before and says the feds are bad" doesn't help your cause.
If your point is to make fun of a war journalist for admitting to have worked with the feds in the past. Okay? I guess?
I still don't understand what I am supposed to garner from this tweet. He's saying very openly that he's worked with feds before, and that these people are bad. You need to create a narrative otherwise you look like you're screaming at the sun.
You linked a "wikispooks" article and then edited it away. Which seems to be where you are getting a lot of your ideas from. If you think it's a valid source, then just link that instead of just posting some tweet from some writer.
He's done journalism in war-zones. Of course he's worked with the feds.
None of that is in this tweet.
Not sure what this post is trying to say. He's saying that they're worse than cops, in that they actually know how to cause the most harm possible.
I just think it's a bad post. If you want to dunk on him, that's fine, but you can do better.