How would Marx write Capital if he was a worm?

If your character is gonna be a cat, shouldn't their name be Luci-purr-sam or Luci-fur-sam?

Some aren't, but a lot have one or two things they have a bizarrely awful takes on. And I don't mean disagreements over history, theory or praxis (for example, wsws defending people like Harvey Weinstein as "witch hunt" victims).

I came for nothing

Exactly, you should've retained your vital essence

There weren't any drones terrorizing the Mid-Atlantic until they locked him up.

Have you eaten the part of my brain responsible for processing love?

According to Shutterstock, where the photo is sourced from, this is an image of London: https://www.shutterstock.com/image-photo/london-uk-02072022-queer-china-flags-2175720419

Edit: There are pride events in mainland China and in Taiwan (probably HK too? idk). Don't know why they didn't use an image from there.

Hazbin Hotel

Perry Mason (not sure I'll continue)

Edit: As an aside, Hazbin Hotel is interesting for showing a character engaging in reformist organizing (appealing to their genocidal oppressor's empathy and reason) only to see that fail and realizing the necessity of armed struggle. Don't want to oversell it but that's literally the arc of the show as of the end of season 1, and I haven't seen anyone else connecting those dots.

Perry Mason is cool because its about a defense attorney rather than pigs or DAs etc. But I just don't enjoy procedurals enough anymore lol

Idiotic article.

A hero of the working class fights for working class interests, They do not merely originate from the working class.

Regardless of his class background, Thompson was successful on the terms of the ruling class. This is to say he was successful on the terms of the enemies of the working class.

Played so much Shadowrun in the 00s. It's so cool that I get to live it irl

Nice.

How many health insurance CEO skulls do we need to trade in for universal healthcare?

Please!

and US cannot exactly bomb and invade it

Not with that attitude!

I agree, although I'm not sure most US people would even view assassinating a healthcare CEO as "political" (which we need to change).

I want a 3 hour video essay exploring the history of the Christmas Prince cinematic universe and its points of divergence from our timeline.

I disagree that they are analogous in their social effect/praxis. Luigi, whatever faults in his posting, had the foresight to make sure his message wasn't muddle by killing randos.

It's at the level of effect that things actually matter.

Were most Americans ever on the unabomber's side? No.

Jesus wasn't gay in the Gospels. He only became gay a few decades after his resurrection.

Did I miss something? I don't think he's a fascist unless one has a very expansive definition of what makes someone a fascist.

CEO shooter didn't kill a bunch of randos.

Luigi deserves our critical support without question. If I was on the jury, I'd never convict him. It doesn't matter if he had cringe takes on social media or our critiques of adventurism etc.

He took the fight to the enemy. His trial will continually raise the question of the injustice of US society under the dictatorship of Capital. It is our duty to take advantage of that.

They'll try to character assassinate him. They'll claim because he came from a relatively well-off background that therefore he is a phony (while they'd claim he was biased if he was poor). They'll try to claim he was deranged or deluded. We need to continually ignore that and drive home to the point that--regardless of any shortcomings--he acted in self-defense against an inhuman monster, against an avatar of Capital.